IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12210-d925913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physiological Implication of Slope Gradient during Incremental Running Test

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Cassirame

    (Laboratory Culture Sport Health and Society (C3S−UR 4660), Sport and Performance Department, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, 25000 Besançon, France
    EA7507, Laboratoire Performance, Santé, Métrologie, Société, 51100 Reims, France
    Mtraining, R&D Division, 25480 Ecole-Valentin, France)

  • Antoine Godin

    (EA3920-Prognostic Markers and Regulatory Factors of Heart and Vascular Diseases, and Exercise Performance, Health, Innovation Platform, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France)

  • Maxime Chamoux

    (Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Performance Santé en Environnement de Montagne (LIPSEM), UR-4604, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 7 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin, 66120 Font-Romeu, France)

  • Gregory Doucende

    (Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Performance Santé en Environnement de Montagne (LIPSEM), UR-4604, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 7 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin, 66120 Font-Romeu, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laurent Mourot

    (EA3920-Prognostic Markers and Regulatory Factors of Heart and Vascular Diseases, and Exercise Performance, Health, Innovation Platform, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Uphill running induces a higher physiological demand than level conditions. Although many studies have investigated this locomotion from a psychological point of view, there is no clear position on the effects of the slope on the physiological variables during an incremental running test performed on a slope condition. The existing studies have heterogeneous designs with different populations or slopes and have reported unclear results. Some studies observed an increase in oxygen consumption, whereas it remained unaffected in others. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a slope on the oxygen consumption, breathing frequency, ventilation and heart rate during an incremental test performed on 0, 15, 25 and 40% gradient slopes by specialist trail runners. The values are compared at the first and second ventilatory threshold and exhaustion. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with a Bonferroni post-hoc analysis, was used to determine the effects of a slope gradient (0, 15, 25 and 40%) on the physiological variables. Our study shows that all the variables are not affected in same way by the slopes during the incremental test. The heart rate and breathing frequency did not differ from the level condition and all the slope gradients at the ventilatory thresholds or exhaustion. At the same time, the ventilation and oxygen consumption increased concomitantly with the slope ( p < 0.001) in all positions. The post-hoc analysis highlighted that the ventilation significantly increased between each successive gradient (0 to 15%, 15% to 25% and 25% to 40%), while the oxygen consumption stopped increasing at the 25% gradient. Our results show that the 25 and 40% gradient slopes allow the specialist trail runners to reach the highest oxygen consumption level.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Cassirame & Antoine Godin & Maxime Chamoux & Gregory Doucende & Laurent Mourot, 2022. "Physiological Implication of Slope Gradient during Incremental Running Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12210-:d:925913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Taheri & G. Hesamian, 2013. "A generalization of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and its applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 457-470, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Shan & Yu-Shan Li & Bon-Gang Hwang & Jia-En Chua, 2021. "Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Gholamreza Hesamian & Jalal Chachi, 2015. "Two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov fuzzy test for fuzzy random variables," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 61-82, February.
    3. Seongmin Kang & Seong-Dong Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Ammonia Emission Sources Characteristics and Emission Factor Uncertainty at Liquefied Natural Gas Power Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Emily Tang & Chelsea Jones & Lorraine Smith-MacDonald & Matthew R. G. Brown & Eric H. G. J. M. Vermetten & Suzette Brémault-Phillips, 2021. "Decreased Emotional Dysregulation Following Multi-Modal Motion-Assisted Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation Therapy (3MDR): Identifying Possible Driving Factors in Remediation of Treatment-Resi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Giacomo Benini & Adam Brandt & Valerio Dotti & Hassan El-Houjeiri, 2023. "The Economic and Environmental Consequences of the Petroleum Industry Extensive Margin," Working Papers 2023:14, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    6. Abbas Parchami & S. Mahmoud Taheri & Reinhard Viertl & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2018. "Minimax test for fuzzy hypotheses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1623-1648, December.
    7. Shima Yosefi & Mohsen Arefi & Mohammad Ghasem Akbari, 2016. "A new approach for testing fuzzy hypotheses based on likelihood ratio statistic," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 665-688, September.
    8. Antonio Faúndez-Ugalde & Patricia Toledo-Zúñiga & Pedro Castro-Rodríguez, 2022. "Tax Sustainability: Tax Transparency in Latin America and the Chilean Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12210-:d:925913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.