IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11749-d917688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verbal Autopsy as a Tool for Defining Causes of Death in Specific Healthcare Contexts: Study of Applicability through a Traditional Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Bailo

    (Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Piazza Cavour, 19, 62032 Camerino, Italy)

  • Filippo Gibelli

    (Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Piazza Cavour, 19, 62032 Camerino, Italy)

  • Giovanna Ricci

    (Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Piazza Cavour, 19, 62032 Camerino, Italy)

  • Ascanio Sirignano

    (Section of Legal Medicine, School of Law, University of Camerino, Piazza Cavour, 19, 62032 Camerino, Italy)

Abstract

Autopsy examination, the gold standard for defining causes of death, is often difficult to apply in certain health care settings, especially in developing countries. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated difficulties in terms of implementing autopsy examinations have made the need for alternative means of determining causes of death even more evident. One of the most interesting alternatives to the conventional autopsy is the verbal autopsy, a tool that originated in Africa and Asia in the 1950s and consists of a structured interview with the deceased’s family members concerning the symptoms manifested by the person and the circumstances of death. In the early 1990s, the first doubts emerged about the validity of verbal autopsies, especially about the real reliability of the cause of death identified through this tool. The objective of the review was to identify studies that had assayed the validity of verbal autopsies through a rigorous comparison of the results that emerged from it with the results of conventional autopsies. When starting from an initial pool of 256 articles, only 2 articles were selected for final review. These are the only two original research articles in which a verbal autopsy validation process was performed by employing the full diagnostic autopsy as the gold standard. The two papers reached opposite conclusions, one suggesting adequate validity of verbal autopsy in defining the cause of death and the other casting serious doubts on the real applicability of this tool. Verbal autopsy undoubtedly has extraordinary potential, especially in the area of health and demographic surveillance, even considering the implementation that could result from the use of artificial intelligence and deep learning. However, at present, there appears to be a lack of solid data to support the robust reliability of this tool in defining causes of death.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Bailo & Filippo Gibelli & Giovanna Ricci & Ascanio Sirignano, 2022. "Verbal Autopsy as a Tool for Defining Causes of Death in Specific Healthcare Contexts: Study of Applicability through a Traditional Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-8, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11749-:d:917688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11749-:d:917688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.