IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11734-d917483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embodied Cognition in Meditation, Yoga, and Ethics—An Experimental Single-Case Study on the Differential Effects of Four Mind–Body Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Matko

    (Institute of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09120 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Peter Sedlmeier

    (Institute of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09120 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Holger C. Bringmann

    (Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Krankenhaus Spremberg, 03130 Spremberg, Germany)

Abstract

Yoga is an embodied contemplative practice considered as a path toward long-term well-being, which fosters an integrated processing of bodily and emotional stimuli. However, little is known about how the different components of yoga contribute to these processes. This was the aim of this single-case multiple-baseline study. Herein, we explored how different yoga components affect body awareness, emotion regulation, affectivity, self-compassion, and distress tolerance. Forty-two randomly assigned participants (from initially fifty-seven) completed one of four 8-week treatments: Mantra meditation alone (MA), meditation plus physical yoga (MY), meditation plus ethical education (ME), and meditation plus yoga and ethical education (MYE). Participants had no prior regular yoga or meditation practice. Data were analyzed using visual inspection, effect size estimation, and multilevel modeling. Surprisingly, all four treatments similarly improved body awareness (Tau- U MA = 0.21 to Tau- U MY = 0.49), emotion regulation (Tau- U MYE = −0.43 to Tau- U ME = −0.52), self-compassion (η 2 = 0.08), and distress tolerance (η 2 = 0.13). These effects were maintained until follow-up at 2 and 12 months after the study, even though home practice declined. The MA condition had the least favorable effect on affective experience (Tau- U MA = −0.14 and 0.07), while the ME condition enhanced valence the most (Tau- U ME = 0.10) and the MY condition was the most effective in preventing negative affective responses. Although mantra meditation on its own negatively influenced daily affect, it can be assumed as the driving force behind the improvement in the other variables. This points to the central role of meditation in increasing interoception, self-awareness, and embodied processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Matko & Peter Sedlmeier & Holger C. Bringmann, 2022. "Embodied Cognition in Meditation, Yoga, and Ethics—An Experimental Single-Case Study on the Differential Effects of Four Mind–Body Treatments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11734-:d:917483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11734-:d:917483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.