IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11360-d911131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Relation with Diet Quality and Mediterranean Diet in Southern Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Godos

    (Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francesca Giampieri

    (Research Group on Food, Nutritional Biochemistry and Health, European University of the Atlantic, 39011 Santander, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wahidah H. Al-Qahtani

    (Department of Food Sciences & Nutrition, College of Food & Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Francesca Scazzina

    (Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125 Parma, Italy)

  • Marialaura Bonaccio

    (Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS NEUROMED, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Grosso

    (Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption has been the focus of major attention due to their potential effects on human health. The aim of this study was to investigate the intake of UPFs in a sample of southern Italian individuals and assess its relationship with nutrient profile and dietary quality parameters. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1936 individuals older than 18 years randomly selected from the general population. A total of 110 food times have been categorized based on the level of processing using the NOVA classification. The average daily energy intake of the sample was 2091.1 kcal, 38.7% of which were from the NOVA group of unprocessed/minimally processed foods, 5.7% from processed culinary ingredients, 38.3% from processed foods, and 17.9% from the UPFs group. UPFs were more consumed among young, unmarried individuals, with high cultural level, smokers, and often eating out of home. The mean energy share of UPFs varied from 6.3% of total daily energy intake for individuals in the lowest quintile of UPF consumption to 34.2% for those in the upper quintile. Within the UPF group, the highest energy contribution was provided by fast foods and sweets. Compared to the lowest quintile of UPF consumption, individuals in the highest quintile consumed, on average, additional 300 kcals per day and less fiber. Some plant-derived vitamins, such as vitamin A and vitamin C showed an inverse trend toward increasing shares of UPF consumption, while sodium intake increased. A significant higher intake of UPFs in individuals meeting the European and Italian dietary recommendations for carbohydrates, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and vitamin E was found, while UPFs were less consumed among those meeting the recommendations for total fats, fiber, sodium, potassium, and vitamin C. Finally, individuals displaying a “healthier” dietary profile, such as higher adherence to either the Mediterranean diet, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, the Alternate Diet Quality Index, and the Diet Quality Index-International, consumed less UPFs and more unprocessed/minimally processed foods, with minor variation in the other NOVA food categories. In conclusion, consumption of UPF in southern Italy is in line with those reported in some other Mediterranean countries, although it negatively impacted the nutrient profile. It is important to monitor the consumption of UPFs before their availability and popularity put the grounds on younger generations’ dietary habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Godos & Francesca Giampieri & Wahidah H. Al-Qahtani & Francesca Scazzina & Marialaura Bonaccio & Giuseppe Grosso, 2022. "Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Relation with Diet Quality and Mediterranean Diet in Southern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11360-:d:911131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11360-:d:911131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.