IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9896-d885445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Performance of a Multivariate Index Assay in Detecting Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer in Filipino Women

Author

Listed:
  • Clarissa L. Velayo

    (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Philippines—Philippine General Hospital, Taft Avenue, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Kareen N. Reforma

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Philippines—Philippine General Hospital, Taft Avenue, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Renee Vina G. Sicam

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Philippines—Philippine General Hospital, Taft Avenue, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Michele H. Diwa

    (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Alvin Duke R. Sy

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Ourlad Alzeus G. Tantengco

    (College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines)

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical performance and overall utility of a multivariate index assay in detecting early-stage ovarian cancer in a Filipino population. This is a prospective cohort study among Filipino women undergoing assessment for an ovarian mass in a tertiary center. Patients diagnosed with early-stage ovarian cancer and who underwent a physical examination before level III specialist ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation, multivariate index assay (MIA2G), and surgery for an adnexal mass were included in this study. Ovarian tumors were classified as high-risk for malignancy based on the IOTA-LR2 score. The ovarian imaging and biomarker results were correlated with the reference standard: surgico-pathologic findings. The MIA2G exhibited the best overall performance among individual classifiers with a sensitivity of 91.7% and NPV of 84.7%, with a concomitant higher sensitivity in early-stage disease, whether as an individual classifier (93.5%) or in serial combination with ultrasound (85.5%). The performance of biomarkers (specificity, positive predictive values, and AUROC) such as MIA2G and CA-125 significantly improved when combined with an ultrasound risk scoring approach ( p < 0.01). MIA2G showed a higher sensitivity for detecting lesions among EOC and late-stage ovarian cancers than otherwise. The application of biomarkers for evaluating ovarian masses in our local setting is secondary to ultrasound but adopting multivariate index assays rather than CA-125 would increase the detection of early-stage ovarian cancers regardless of menopausal status. This is most relevant in areas where level III sonographers or gynecologic oncologists are limited and preoperative referrals to these specialists can improve the survival of our patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarissa L. Velayo & Kareen N. Reforma & Renee Vina G. Sicam & Michele H. Diwa & Alvin Duke R. Sy & Ourlad Alzeus G. Tantengco, 2022. "Clinical Performance of a Multivariate Index Assay in Detecting Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer in Filipino Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9896-:d:885445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9896/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9896/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9896-:d:885445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.