IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7221-d837379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Sociodemographic, Professional, and Incentive Factors and Self-Reported Level of Physical Activity in the Nurse Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Wesołowska-Górniak

    (Department of Clinical Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Nerek

    (Department of Clinical Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Lena Serafin

    (Department of Clinical Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Bożena Czarkowska-Pączek

    (Department of Clinical Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Research indicates that while nurses are aware of the benefits of physical activity (PA), their adherence to PA is low. The results of workplace interventions that increase PA are inconsistent. The study aim was identification the sociodemographic, professional, and incentive factors influencing nurses’ PA and investigation its relationship with the level of PA that they report. This study was based on observational cross-sectional research conducted among professionally active nurses working in a clinical setting ( n = 350). The self-reported questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic and employment data and motivators and barriers of participating in PA. The level of PA was assessed using International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The analysis revealed significant differences in the Total Physical Activity Score (TPAS) depending on the variables related to professional activity (working in a management position: p = 0.015; workplace: p = 0.01; shift type: p ≤ 0.002). Cluster analysis revealed that the most important statement in the group division about motivation was fear of the pain occurring after exercise. Nurses who were more motivated to be active showed a higher level of leisure-time PA than less motivated nurses. The recommendation of PA in the nursing population should be focused on increasing the leisure time PA, ensuring the appropriate time to recovery, and compliance with the principles of work ergonomics to prevent musculoskeletal disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Wesołowska-Górniak & Agnieszka Nerek & Lena Serafin & Bożena Czarkowska-Pączek, 2022. "The Relationship between Sociodemographic, Professional, and Incentive Factors and Self-Reported Level of Physical Activity in the Nurse Population: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7221-:d:837379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin E Uhlig & Berthold Seitz & Nicole Eter & Julia Promesberger & Holger Busse, 2014. "Efficiencies of Internet-Based Digital and Paper-Based Scientific Surveys and the Estimated Costs and Time for Different-Sized Cohorts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Magno Conceição das Merces & Julita Maria Freitas Coelho & Iracema Lua & Douglas de Souza e Silva & Antonio Marcos Tosoli Gomes & Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann & Denize Cristina de Oliveira & Sueli Bonfi, 2020. "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Burnout Syndrome among Primary Health Care Nursing Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Tim Henwood & Anthony Tuckett & Catherine Turner, 2012. "What makes a healthier nurse, workplace or leisure physical activity? Informed by the Australian and New Zealand e‐Cohort Study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1746-1754, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Hertling & Franziska Maria Loos & Isabel Graul, 2021. "Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Grażyna Puto & Maria Jurzec & Anna Leja-Szpak & Joanna Bonior & Marta Muszalik & Agnieszka Gniadek, 2021. "Stress and Coping Strategies of Nurses Working with Patients Infected with and Not Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Virus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Jaewon Han & Sugie Lee, 2023. "Verification of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Streetscape Evaluation Method in Urban Residential Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Maksymilian Gajda & Małgorzata Kowalska & Jan E. Zejda, 2018. "Evaluation of the First Polish Web-Based Intervention Aimed at Improving Cancer Prevention (the PORINA Study)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Guido A. Veldhuis & Teun Sluijs & Marianne H. J. van Zwieten & Jildau Bouwman & Noortje M. Wiezer & Heleen M. Wortelboer, 2020. "A Proof-of-Concept System Dynamics Simulation Model of the Development of Burnout and Recovery Using Retrospective Case Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Jimmy Bordarie & Caroline Mourtialon, 2023. "Study of the Relationship between Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Burnout Syndrome among Speech and Language Therapists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Yeongmi Ha & Sang-Ho Lee & Dong-Ha Lee & Young-Hun Kang & Woonjoo Choi & Jinung An, 2022. "Effectiveness of a Mobile Wellness Program for Nurses with Rotating Shifts during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7221-:d:837379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.