IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p398-d714891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Near-Peer Teaching in Human Anatomy from a Tutors’ Perspective: An Eighteen-Year-Old Experience at the University of Bologna

Author

Listed:
  • Ester Orsini

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the work.)

  • Marilisa Quaranta

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the work.)

  • Giulia Adalgisa Mariani

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Sara Mongiorgi

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Lucio Cocco

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Anna Maria Billi

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Lucia Manzoli

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Stefano Ratti

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Human Anatomy Section, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The University of Bologna School of Medicine in 2003 adopted a near-peer teaching (NPT) program with senior medical students teaching and assisting younger students in human anatomy laboratories. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of this program—unique on the Italian academic panorama—from the tutors’ perspective. An anonymous online survey was administered to all those who acted as peer tutors in the period from 2003 to 2021; it evaluated tutors’ perceptions regarding the influence of the tutoring experience on their skillset gains, academic performance, and professional career. Furthermore, tutors were asked to express their views on the value of cadaver dissection in medical education and professional development. The overall perception of the NPT program was overwhelmingly positive and the main reported benefits were improved long-term knowledge retention and academic performance, improved communication, team-working and time management skills, and enhanced self-confidence and motivation. Most tutors strongly believed that cadaver dissection was an invaluable learning tool in medical education, helped them to develop professionalism and human values, and positively influenced the caring of their future patients. Nearly all the participants highlighted the importance of voluntary body donation for medical education and research. The present results supported the thesis that tutors themselves benefited from the act of teaching peers; this impactful experience equipped them with a wide range of transferable skills that they could draw on as future educators and healthcare professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ester Orsini & Marilisa Quaranta & Giulia Adalgisa Mariani & Sara Mongiorgi & Lucio Cocco & Anna Maria Billi & Lucia Manzoli & Stefano Ratti, 2021. "Near-Peer Teaching in Human Anatomy from a Tutors’ Perspective: An Eighteen-Year-Old Experience at the University of Bologna," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:398-:d:714891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Loda & Rebecca Erschens & Hannah Loenneker & Katharina E Keifenheim & Christoph Nikendei & Florian Junne & Stephan Zipfel & Anne Herrmann-Werner, 2019. "Cognitive and social congruence in peer-assisted learning – A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:398-:d:714891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.