IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p26-d707520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citation Network Study on the Use of New Technologies in Neurorehabilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Vanesa Abuín-Porras

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Fundación DACER, Área de I+D+I, San Sebastián de los Reyes, 28702 Madrid, Spain)

  • Clara Martinez-Perez

    (ISEC LISBOA—Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências, 1750-179 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carlos Romero-Morales

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

  • Patricia Martín-Casas

    (Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid, IdISSC, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Patricia Palomo-López

    (University Center of Plasencia, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena

    (ISEC LISBOA—Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências, 1750-179 Lisboa, Portugal
    Department of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28037 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

New technologies in neurorehabilitation is a wide concept that intends to find solutions for individual and collective needs through technical systems. Analysis through citation networks is used to search scientific literature related to a specific topic. On the one hand, the main countries, institutions, and authors researching this topic have been identified, as well as their evolution over time. On the other hand, the links between the authors, the countries, and the topics under research have been analyzed. The publications analysis was performed through the Web of Science database using the search terms “new technolog*,” “neurorehabilitation,” “physical therapy*,” and “occupational therapy*.” The selected interval of publication was from 1992 to December 2020. The results were analyzed using CitNetExplorer software. After a Web of Science search, a total of 454 publications and 135 citation networks were found, 1992 being the first year of publication. An exponential increase was detected from the year 2009. The largest number was detected in 2020. The main areas are rehabilitation and neurosciences and neurology. The most cited article was from Perry et al. in 2007, with a citation index of 460. The analysis of the top 20 most cited articles shows that most approach the use of robotic devices and brain–computer interface systems. In conclusion, the main theme was found to be the use of robotic devices to address neuromuscular rehabilitation goals and brain–computer interfaces and their applications in neurorehabilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanesa Abuín-Porras & Clara Martinez-Perez & Carlos Romero-Morales & Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda & Patricia Martín-Casas & Patricia Palomo-López & Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena, 2021. "Citation Network Study on the Use of New Technologies in Neurorehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:26-:d:707520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilar Aparicio-Martinez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & María Pilar Martinez-Jimenez & María Dolores Redel-Macías & Manuel Vaquero-Abellan & Claudia Pagliari, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Health Field Regarding Social Networks and Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    3. van Eck, Nees Jan & Waltman, Ludo, 2014. "CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 802-823.
    4. Bar-Ilan, Judit & Levene, Mark & Lin, Ayelet, 2007. "Some measures for comparing citation databases," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 26-34.
    5. Akshaya Kumar Biswal, 2013. "An Absolute Index (Ab-index) to Measure a Researcher’s Useful Contributions and Productivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henrique Nascimento & Clara Martinez-Perez & Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina & Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena, 2020. "Citations Network Analysis of Vision and Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    3. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Moaaz Kabil & Mohamed Abouelseoud & Faisal Alsubaie & Heba Mostafa Hassan & Imre Varga & Katalin Csobán & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2022. "Evolutionary Relationship between Tourism and Real Estate: Evidence and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Jensen, Scott & Liu, Xiaozhong & Yu, Yingying & Milojevic, Staša, 2016. "Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 606-621.
    6. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Yong Qin, 2022. "Structure, trend and prospect of operational research: a scientific analysis for publications from 1952 to 2020 included in Web of Science database," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-672, December.
    7. Ben Zhang & Chenxu Ming, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Open Innovation Planning of Response to COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Tosi, Mauro Dalle Lucca & dos Reis, Julio Cesar, 2021. "SciKGraph: A knowledge graph approach to structure a scientific field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    9. Clara Martinez-Perez & Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina & Cesar Villa-Collar & Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena, 2020. "Current State and Future Trends: A Citation Network Analysis of the Academic Performance Field," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Ratri Parida & Manoj Kumar Dash & Anil Kumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Sunil Luthra & Eyob Mulat‐weldemeskel, 2022. "Evolution of supply chain finance: A comprehensive review and proposed research directions with network clustering analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1343-1369, October.
    11. Yue Guiling & Siti Aisyah Panatik & Mohammad Saipol Mohd Sukor & Noraini Rusbadrol & Li Cunlin, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    12. Qin, Yong & Xu, Zeshui & Wang, Xinxin & Škare, Marinko, 2022. "Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Massimo Franceschet & Giovanni Colavizza, 2020. "Quantifying the higher-order influence of scientific publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 951-963, November.
    15. Clara Martinez-Perez & Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina & Cesar Villa-Collar & Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena, 2020. "Citation Network Analysis of the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Angela Chantre-Astaiza & Laura Fuentes-Moraleda & Ana Muñoz-Mazón & Gustavo Ramirez-Gonzalez, 2019. "Science Mapping of Tourist Mobility 1980–2019. Technological Advancements in the Collection of the Data for Tourist Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-32, August.
    17. Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga & Javier Cifuentes-Faura & Ursula Faura-Martínez, 2021. "Sustainability, Big Data and Mathematical Techniques: A Bibliometric Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Juan Pablo Bascur & Suzan Verberne & Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2023. "Academic information retrieval using citation clusters: in-depth evaluation based on systematic reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2895-2921, May.
    19. Moaaz Kabil & Setiawan Priatmoko & Róbert Magda & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Blue Economy and Coastal Tourism: A Comprehensive Visualization Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Kun Shi & Yi Zhou & Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Mapping the Research Trends of Household Waste Recycling: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:26-:d:707520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.