IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3592-d526905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adhesion and Removal of Thirdhand Smoke from Indoor Fabrics: A Method for Rapid Assessment and Identification of Chemical Repositories

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna L. Pozuelos

    (Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA)

  • Peyton Jacob

    (Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Clinical Pharmacology Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA)

  • Suzaynn F. Schick

    (Department of Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA)

  • Esther E. Omaiye

    (Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA)

  • Prue Talbot

    (Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA)

Abstract

Thirdhand smoke (THS) is an environmental contaminant that may cause adverse health effects in smokers and nonsmokers. Currently, time-consuming analytical methods are necessary to assess chemicals in THS repositories, like upholstered furniture and clothing. Our goal was to develop a rapid, accessible method that can be used to measure THS contamination in common household fabrics and to evaluate remediation. Cotton, terry cloth, polyester, and wool were exposed to THS for various times in a controlled laboratory environment and then extracted in various media at room temperature or 60 °C to develop an autofluorescent method to quantify THS. Concentrations of nicotine and related alkaloids in the extracts were determined using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The autofluorescence of extracts was proportional to the time and amount of THS exposure received by cotton and terry cloth. Extracts of polyester and wool did not show autofluorescence unless heat was applied during extraction. Nicotine, nicotine alkaloids, and TSNA concentrations were higher in THS extracts from cotton and terry cloth than extracts of polyester and wool carpet, in agreement with the autofluorescence data. For fabrics spiked with 10 mg of nicotine, extraction efficiency was much higher from terry cloth (7 mg) than polyester (0.11 mg). In high relative humidity, nicotine recovery from both cotton and polyester was 80% (~8 mg). Our results provide a simple, rapid method to assess THS contaminants in household fabrics and further show that THS extraction is influenced by fabric type, heat, and humidity. Thus, remediation of THS environments may need to vary depending on the fabric reservoirs being treated. Understanding the dynamics of THS in fabrics can help set up appropriate remediation policies to protect humans from exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna L. Pozuelos & Peyton Jacob & Suzaynn F. Schick & Esther E. Omaiye & Prue Talbot, 2021. "Adhesion and Removal of Thirdhand Smoke from Indoor Fabrics: A Method for Rapid Assessment and Identification of Chemical Repositories," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3592-:d:526905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3592-:d:526905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.