IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2339-d507202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Veterinary-Prescribed Physical Activity: Feasibility and Acceptability among Veterinary Staff and Dog Owners

Author

Listed:
  • Katrina Oselinsky

    (Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Colleen G. Duncan

    (Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, 1619 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Heather E. Martinez

    (Council of State and Territory Epidemiologists, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, 4300 Cherry Creek S Dr, Denver, CO 80246, USA)

  • Dan J. Graham

    (Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

Abstract

Physical inactivity remains a global epidemic leading to an estimated 5 million preventable deaths per year. Although there exist numerous public-health campaigns aimed at increasing physical activity (PA), a potentially fruitful but underexplored avenue to promote both human and animal health is veterinary-prescribed PA programs. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating veterinary-prescribed PA programming into a diverse array of clinic settings. Participants (n = 722 veterinary-clinic staff (VS); n = 1028 dog owners (DOs)) completed an online survey assessing: (a) the perceived importance of PA for promoting health and preventing disease, (b) willingness to participate in a veterinary-prescribed PA program, and (c) potential benefits and barriers of such a program. Both groups of participants indicated that PA is important for both human and animal health (97% and 98% of VS and 92% and 93% of DOs said PA is very or extremely important for animal and human health, respectively). Additionally, most participants in both groups expressed an interest in participating in a veterinary-prescribed PA program in the future, with only 11% of DOs and 10% of VS saying they were not interested. Benefits and barriers of this type of intervention for both practitioners and patients were also identified. Incorporating veterinary-prescribed PA programming into veterinary clinics seems to be acceptable to both DOs and VS. Additionally, many VS believe such programming would be feasible at their clinics; thus, pursuing such programs appears to be a promising avenue for promoting human and animal health.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrina Oselinsky & Colleen G. Duncan & Heather E. Martinez & Dan J. Graham, 2021. "Veterinary-Prescribed Physical Activity: Feasibility and Acceptability among Veterinary Staff and Dog Owners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2339-:d:507202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2339/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2339/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2339-:d:507202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.