IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1499-d493748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Anthropometric Data and Physical Fitness Scores to Predict Selection in a National U19 Rugby Union Team

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Vaz

    (Department of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Wilbur Kraak

    (Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

  • Marco Batista

    (Department of Sports and Well-Being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, SHERU (Sport, Health and Exercise Research Unit), 6000-084 Castelo Branco, Portugal)

  • Samuel Honório

    (Department of Sports and Well-Being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, SHERU (Sport, Health and Exercise Research Unit), 6000-084 Castelo Branco, Portugal)

  • Hélder Miguel Fernandes

    (Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Research in Education and Community Intervention, RECI, 3500 Viseu, Portugal)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare measures of anthropometry characteristics and physical fitness performance between rugby union players (17.9 ± 0.5 years old) recruited (n = 39) and non-recruited (n = 145) to the Portuguese under-19 (U19) national team, controlling for their playing position (forwards or backs). Standardized anthropometric, physical, and performance assessment tests included players’ body mass and height, push up and pull-up test, squat test, sit-and-reach test, 20 m shuttle run test, flexed arm hang test, Sargent test, handgrip strength test, Illinois agility test, and 20-m and 50-m sprint test. Results showed that recruited forwards players had better agility scores ( p = 0.02, ES = −0.55) than the non-recruited forwards, whereas recruited backs players had higher right ( p < 0.01, ES = 0.84) and left ( p = 0.01, ES = 0.74) handgrip strength scores than their counterparts. Logistic regression showed that better agility (for the forwards) and right handgrip strength scores (for the backs) were the only variables significantly associated with an increased likelihood of being recruited to the national team. In sum, these findings suggest that certain well-developed physical qualities, namely, agility for the forwards players and upper-body strength for the back players, partially explain the selection of U19 rugby players to their national team.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Vaz & Wilbur Kraak & Marco Batista & Samuel Honório & Hélder Miguel Fernandes, 2021. "Using Anthropometric Data and Physical Fitness Scores to Predict Selection in a National U19 Rugby Union Team," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1499-:d:493748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Logan Posthumus & Campbell Macgregor & Paul Winwood & Jamie Tout & Lillian Morton & Matthew Driller & Nicholas Gill, 2020. "The Physical Characteristics of Elite Female Rugby Union Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Garden Tabacchi & Guillermo F. Lopez Sanchez & Fatma Nese Sahin & Meltem Kizilyalli & Rosario Genchi & Michele Basile & Musa Kirkar & Carlos Silva & Nuno Loureiro & Eduardo Teixeira & Yolanda Demetrio, 2019. "Field-Based Tests for the Assessment of Physical Fitness in Children and Adolescents Practicing Sport: A Systematic Review within the ESA Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garden Tabacchi & Luca Petrigna & Giuseppe Battaglia & Giovanni Navarra & Antonio Palma & Marianna Bellafiore, 2021. "An Interaction Path of Mothers’ and Preschoolers’ Food- and Physical Activity-Related Aspects in Disadvantaged Sicilian Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Moisés Marquina Nieto & Jesús Rivilla-García & Alfonso de la Rubia & Jorge Lorenzo-Calvo, 2022. "Assessment of the Speed and Power of Push-Ups Performed on Surfaces with Different Degrees of Instability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. José Rodrigues & Carla Chicau Borrego & Paula Ruivo & Pedro Sobreiro & David Catela & José Amendoeira & Rui Matos, 2020. "Conceptual Framework for the Research on Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Katarzyna Ługowska & Wojciech Kolanowski & Joanna Trafialek, 2020. "Eating Behaviour and Physical Fitness in 10-Year-Old Children Attending General Education and Sports Classes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. José M. Oliva-Lozano & José M. Muyor, 2020. "Core Muscle Activity during Physical Fitness Exercises: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-42, June.
    6. Olha Podrihalo & Svetlana Savina & Leonid Podrigalo & Sergii Iermakov & Władysław Jagiełło & Łukasz Rydzik & Wiesław Błach, 2020. "Influence of Health Related Fitness on the Morphofunctional Condition of Second Mature Aged Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-9, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1499-:d:493748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.