IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1017-d486088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • María Dolores Guerra-Martín

    (Department of Nursing, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • María Sandra Tejedor-Bueno

    (Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Matías Correa-Casado

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
    Public Health Business Agency Hospital de Poniente, 04700 Almería, Spain)

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. In Spain, about a quarter of a million cases were diagnosed in 2017, and 81% of the Spanish population has used, at least once, some kind of complementary therapy. Said therapies are increasingly being used by cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to analyse the effectiveness of complementary therapies among cancer patients. A systematic peer review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guide in four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and WOS). The inclusion criteria were Randomised Clinical Trials, published between 2013 and 2018, with a value of 3 or more on the Jadad Scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019127593). The study sample amounted to 1845 patients (64.55% women), the most common being breast cancer patients (794), followed by lung cancer patients (341). Fifteen complementary therapies were identified. We found two studies for each of the following: electroacupuncture, phytotherapy, hypnotherapy, guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation. From the remaining ones, we identified a study on each therapy. The findings reveal some effective complementary therapies: auriculotherapy and acupuncture, laser moxibustion, hypnosis, Ayurveda, electroacupuncture, progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, yoga, phytotherapy, music therapy and traditional Chinese medicine. On the other hand, electroacupuncture, laser moxibustion and traditional Chinese medicine presented adverse effects, and kinesiology did not show effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • María Dolores Guerra-Martín & María Sandra Tejedor-Bueno & Matías Correa-Casado, 2021. "Effectiveness of Complementary Therapies in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1017-:d:486088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1017-:d:486088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.