IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12861-d696279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Pre-Hospital Tourniquet in Emergency Patients with Major Trauma and Uncontrolled Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Latina

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy
    Department of Health Promotion Science, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
    Co-first authors.)

  • Laura Iacorossi

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy
    IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Roma, Italy
    Co-first authors.)

  • Alice Josephine Fauci

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy
    Co-first authors.)

  • Annalisa Biffi

    (Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Greta Castellini

    (Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy)

  • Daniela Coclite

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniela D’Angelo

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy)

  • Silvia Gianola

    (Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy)

  • Veronica Mari

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonello Napoletano

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy
    Current Address: Centro Nazionale per l’Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure (CNEC), Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella, 34, 00162 Rome, Italy.)

  • Gloria Porcu

    (Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy)

  • Matteo Ruggeri

    (National Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy)

  • Primiano Iannone

    (National Centre for Clinical Excellence Healthcare Quality and Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Via Giano della Bella 34, 00162 Rome, Italy
    Co-last authors.)

  • Osvaldo Chiara

    (General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy
    Co-last authors.)

  • on behalf of INIH—Major Trauma

    (Membership of the Italian National Institute of Health Guideline Working Group on Major Trauma is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

Abstract

Trauma is one of the leading causes of uncontrolled haemorrhage, death, and disability. Use of a tourniquet can be considered an optimal anti-haemorrhagic resource, in pre-hospital and emergency settings, and its lifesaving effect is clinically contradictory. This review aims to assess the clinical efficacy of the tourniquet in the emergency pre-hospital care setting for the management of haemorrhage. We conducted the systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, the PRISMA statement. We searched the following electronic databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane-CENTRAL. All studies included were appraised for risk of bias. Prevalent primary outcomes were mortality and use of blood products. Secondary outcomes were related to adverse effects. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Four studies were involved (1762 trauma patients). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.47 (95% confidence Interval (CI) 0.19–1.16; three studies; 377 patients) for overall mortality estimates did not give a clear indication of the benefits of emergency pre-hospital tourniquets (PH-TQ) versus no pre-hospital tourniquet (NO PH-TQ) placement. The adjusted mean difference for blood product use was −3.28 (95% CI −11.22, 4.66) for packed red blood cells (pRBC) and −4.80 (95% CI −5.61, −3.99) for plasma, respectively. The certainty of evidence was downgraded to very low for all outcomes. Our results suggest an unclear effect of emergency pre-hospital tourniquet placement on overall mortality and blood product use. However, this systematic review highlights the availability of only observational studies and the absence of high quality RCTs assessing the efficacy of PH-TQs. Randomized controlled trials are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Latina & Laura Iacorossi & Alice Josephine Fauci & Annalisa Biffi & Greta Castellini & Daniela Coclite & Daniela D’Angelo & Silvia Gianola & Veronica Mari & Antonello Napoletano & Gloria Porcu, 2021. "Effectiveness of Pre-Hospital Tourniquet in Emergency Patients with Major Trauma and Uncontrolled Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12861-:d:696279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12861-:d:696279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.