IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12514-d689745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Young Kwon

    (Department of Nursing, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon 39528, Korea)

  • Nam Yi Kim

    (College of Nursing, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale (K-CCSMS). This study consisted of two phases. First, in accordance with the guidelines of the World Health Organization, the Korean version of the scale was developed in five stages. Second, data from 206 general and tertiary hospital nurses were analyzed to confirm the validity and reliability of the K-CCSMS; thus, the construct validity, criterion-related validity, and reliability were confirmed. In total, 21 items divided across four factors (i.e., stressing the importance of safety rules and monitoring, providing employees with feedback, showing role modeling behavior, and creating safety awareness) were identified through exploratory factor analysis. Three items were deleted through confirmatory factor analysis, and the model fit was as follows: normed χ 2 = 2.80, normed fit index = 0.87, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.90, comparative fit index = 0.92, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.05. The correlation coefficient between the K-CCSMS and patient safety culture was 0.76 ( p < 0.001), and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.95). For patient safety, an appropriate combination of control- and commitment-based management is required, and the 18-item K-CCSMS showed usefulness and reliability in determining such a balance and evaluating the leadership styles of Korean nursing managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Young Kwon & Nam Yi Kim, 2021. "Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12514-:d:689745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12514-:d:689745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.