IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12396-d687873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Inter-Rectus Distance and Abdominopelvic Function between Nulliparous, Primiparous and Multiparous Women

Author

Listed:
  • Mercè Balasch-Bernat

    (Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Sofía Pérez-Alenda

    (Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Juan J. Carrasco

    (Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Begoña Valls-Donderis

    (Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Lirios Dueñas

    (Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    These two authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Laura Fuentes-Aparicio

    (Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi Speciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    These two authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Widening of the inter-rectus distance (IRD) is highly prevalent among postpartum women and can lead to dysfunction of abdominopelvic muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in IRD and abdominopelvic function between nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous women. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 75 women (25 nulliparous, 25 primiparous and 25 multiparous at 6 months postpartum). The participants underwent ultrasound assessment under three conditions (at rest, abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) and curl-up) at two locations (2 cm above and 2 cm below the umbilicus). Furthermore, abdominopelvic muscle function was determined by prone, supine and side bridge tests. In all conditions and locations, the IRD were significantly higher ( p < 0.05) in the primiparous and multiparous women than in the nulliparous. The multiparous women presented greater ( p > 0.05) IRD at rest and during ADIM compared to the primiparous women. Regarding abdominopelvic muscle function, differences were only significant ( p < 0.05) between the nulliparous with primiparous women in prone and supine conditions. These findings suggest that parity influences IRD: women at 6 months postpartum present greater IRD compared to nulliparous women; multiparous women present greater IRD at rest and during the activation of deep abdominal muscles than primiparous women; and primiparous women exhibit worse abdominopelvic muscle function than nulliparous women.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercè Balasch-Bernat & Sofía Pérez-Alenda & Juan J. Carrasco & Begoña Valls-Donderis & Lirios Dueñas & Laura Fuentes-Aparicio, 2021. "Differences in Inter-Rectus Distance and Abdominopelvic Function between Nulliparous, Primiparous and Multiparous Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12396-:d:687873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mako Fukano & Yuka Tsukahara & Seira Takei & Sayaka Nose-Ogura & Tomoyuki Fujii & Suguru Torii, 2021. "Recovery of Abdominal Muscle Thickness and Contractile Function in Women after Childbirth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mako Fukano & Kozo Aisaka & Sayaka Nose-Ogura & Tomoyuki Fujii & Suguru Torii, 2022. "Progressive Changes in Lumbopelvic Alignment during the Three Month-Postpartum Recovery Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-7, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12396-:d:687873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.