IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11554-d671473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Oral Health and Related Health Behaviour Interventions in Adults with Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Laura J. McGowan

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Emma C. Joyes

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Emma A. Adams

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Aishah Coyte

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Richard Gavin

    (Northumbria Healthcare, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE27 0QG, UK)

  • Catherine Richmond

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Hosein Shabaninejad

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Fiona Beyer

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Angela Broadbridge

    (Fulfilling Lives Newcastle/Gateshead, Gateshead NE8 4DY, UK)

  • Kevin Dobson

    (Fulfilling Lives Newcastle/Gateshead, Gateshead NE8 4DY, UK)

  • David Landes

    (Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK)

  • Suzanne Moffatt

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Richard G. Watt

    (Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK)

  • Falko F. Sniehotta

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Ruth Freeman

    (Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK)

  • Martha Paisi

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Clare Bambra

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Dawn Craig

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Eileen Kaner

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

  • Sheena E. Ramsay

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK)

Abstract

Increasing numbers of people in England experience homelessness, substance use, and repeated offending (known as ‘severe and multiple disadvantage’; SMD). Populations experiencing SMD often have extremely poor oral health, which is closely inter-linked with high levels of substance use, smoking, and poor diet. This study aims to undertake an evidence synthesis to identify the effectiveness, resource requirements, and factors influencing the implementation and acceptability of oral health and related health behaviour interventions in adults experiencing SMD. Two systematic reviews will be conducted using mixed-methods. Review 1 will investigate the effectiveness and resource implications of oral health and related health behaviours (substance use, smoking, diet) interventions; Review 2 will investigate factors influencing the implementation of such interventions. The population includes adults (≥18 years) experiencing SMD. Standard review methods in terms of searches, screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal will be conducted. Narrative syntheses will be conducted. If feasible, a meta-analysis will be conducted for Review 1 and a thematic synthesis for Review 2. Evidence from the two reviews will then be synthesised together. Input from people with experience of SMD will be sought throughout to inform the reviews. An initial logic model will be iteratively refined during the review.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura J. McGowan & Emma C. Joyes & Emma A. Adams & Aishah Coyte & Richard Gavin & Catherine Richmond & Hosein Shabaninejad & Fiona Beyer & Angela Broadbridge & Kevin Dobson & David Landes & Suzanne Mo, 2021. "Investigating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Oral Health and Related Health Behaviour Interventions in Adults with Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Rev," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11554-:d:671473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11554-:d:671473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.