IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10035-d641941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phubbing and Social Intelligence: Role-Playing Experiment on Bystander Inaccessibility

Author

Listed:
  • Eerik Mantere

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland
    Faculty of Sociology, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France)

  • Nina Savela

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland)

  • Atte Oksanen

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

Smartphone use has changed patterns of online and offline interaction. Phubbing (i.e., looking at one’s phone instead of paying attention to others) is an increasingly recognized phenomenon in offline interaction. We examined whether people who phub are more likely to have lower social intelligence, whether phubbing is considered more annoying than being ignored due to reading a magazine, and if people describe smartphones and magazines differently as sources of social distraction. We collected two survey samples ( N = 112, N = 108) for a cartoon-based role-playing experiment (the Bystander Inaccessibility Experiment) in which a smartphone user and a person reading a magazine ignored the respondents’ conversational initiatives. Annoyance in each scenario was measured, and written accounts were collected on why the respondents rated the scenarios the way they did. Other measures used included the Generic Scale of Phubbing, Generic Scale of Being Phubbed, and Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale. The results showed that participants in both samples were more annoyed by phubbing than by being ignored due to reading a magazine. Linear regression analyses showed that phubbing was associated with lower social intelligence, even after adjusting for confounding factors. The annoyingness of phubbing was explained with negative attitudes toward smartphones, which were assumed to be used for useless endeavors, while magazines were more appreciated and seen as more cultivating. The role of bystanders’ epistemic access to the smartphone user’s activities is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Eerik Mantere & Nina Savela & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "Phubbing and Social Intelligence: Role-Playing Experiment on Bystander Inaccessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10035-:d:641941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni & Ambra Capelli & Patrizia Meringolo, 2019. "An Explorative Model to Assess Individuals’ Phubbing Risk," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meredith E. David & James A. Roberts, 2020. "Developing and Testing a Scale Designed to Measure Perceived Phubbing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Fortuna Procentese & Flora Gatti & Immacolata Di Napoli, 2019. "Families and Social Media Use: The Role of Parents’ Perceptions about Social Media Impact on Family Systems in the Relationship between Family Collective Efficacy and Open Communication," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Mohammad Saud Alotaibi & Mim Fox & Robyn Coman & Zubair Ahmed Ratan & Hassan Hosseinzadeh, 2022. "Smartphone Addiction Prevalence and Its Association on Academic Performance, Physical Health, and Mental Well-Being among University Students in Umm Al-Qura University (UQU), Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Chanhee Kim & Kyung Im Kang & Nayoon Lee, 2020. "Intergenerational Transmissions of Mother–Adolescent Smartphone Dependency: The Mediating Role of Negative Parenting and the Moderating Role of Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Andrea Guazzini & Tommaso Raimondi & Benedetta Biagini & Franco Bagnoli & Mirko Duradoni, 2021. "Phubber’s Emotional Activations: The Association between PANAS and Phubbing Behavior," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Seung-Yup Lee & Hae Kook Lee & Jung-Seok Choi & Soo-young Bang & Min-Hyeon Park & Kyu-In Jung & Yong-Sil Kweon, 2020. "The Matthew Effect in Recovery from Smartphone Addiction in a 6-Month Longitudinal Study of Children and Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Lorena Marotta & Andrea Pesce & Andrea Guazzini, 2020. "Before and after the Quarantine: An Approximate Study on the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on the Italian Population during the Lockdown Period," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Marta Nowak & Kamila Rachubińska & Małgorzata Starczewska & Ewa Kupcewicz & Aleksandra Szylińska & Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska & Elżbieta Grochans, 2022. "Correlations between Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Depressiveness and Daytime Sleepiness, as Well as Perceived Social Support in Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Mirko Duradoni & Federico Innocenti & Andrea Guazzini, 2020. "Well-Being and Social Media: A Systematic Review of Bergen Addiction Scales," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10035-:d:641941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.