IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9735-d636288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of COVID-19 in Professionals Working in Geriatric Environment: Multicenter Prospective Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anca-Maria Mihai

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Jérémy Barben

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Mélanie Dipanda

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Jérémie Vovelle

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Valentine Nuss

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Camille Baudin-Senegas

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Alain Putot

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France)

  • Patrick Manckoundia

    (“Pôle Personnes Âgées”, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France
    INSERM U-1093, Cognition, Action and Sensorimotor Plasticity, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France)

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are exposed to a higher risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) contamination. This prospective multicenter study describes the characteristics of HCWs tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) while working in a geriatric environment. We also compared HCWs with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) assay (RTPCR+ group) and those with a negative test result (RTPCR− group). Between 15/5/2020 and 15/9/2020, 258 HCWs, employed in the acute geriatric unit (AGU), geriatric rehabilitation unit (GRU) or nursing home of three hospitals in Burgundy (France) were invited to complete an online survey. Among the 171 respondents, 83 participants, with mean age 42 years and 87.9% female, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these 83 participants, COVID-19 was confirmed in 38 cases (RTPCR+ group) of which 36 were symptomatic, and the RTPCR assay was negative in 45 cases (RTPCR− group) of which 20 participants were symptomatic. A total of 22.9% (of 83) had comorbidities, 21.7% were active smokers, and 65.1% had received the flu vaccine. A total of 37.3% worked in AGU, 19.3% in GRU and 16.9% in nursing homes. The most common symptom described was headache (23.2%), followed by fatigue or cough (12.5% each), and fever or myalgia (10.7% each). There were more participants with normal body mass index ( p = 0.03) in the RTPCR+ group. In contrast, there were more users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( p = 0.01), active smokers ( p = 0.03) and flu vaccinated ( p = 0.01) in the RTPCR− group. No difference was found between the two groups for the type of work ( p = 0.20 for physicians and p = 0.18 for nurses). However, acquiring COVID-19 was significantly associated with working in AGU ( p < 0.001) and nursing homes ( p = 0.001). There were significantly more users of surgical masks ( p = 0.035) in the RTPCR+ group and more filtering facepiece-2 mask users ( p = 0.016) in the RTPCR− group. Our results reflect the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Further studies are needed to evaluate and track the risks and consequences of COVID-19 in HCWs.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca-Maria Mihai & Jérémy Barben & Mélanie Dipanda & Jérémie Vovelle & Valentine Nuss & Camille Baudin-Senegas & Alain Putot & Patrick Manckoundia, 2021. "Analysis of COVID-19 in Professionals Working in Geriatric Environment: Multicenter Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9735-:d:636288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9735-:d:636288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.