IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8460-d612019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Call to Clarify the Intensity and Classification of Standing Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Kowalsky

    (Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA)

  • Lee Stoner

    (Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Mark A. Faghy

    (Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK)

  • Bethany Barone Gibbs

    (Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

Abstract

Public health guidelines for physical activity now include recommendations to break up prolonged sitting with light-intensity activities. Concurrently, interventions to increase standing have emerged, especially within the workplace in the form of sit–stand or standing workstations. Moreover, in short-duration studies, breaking up prolonged sitting with standing has been associated improved cardiometabolic outcomes. Publicly available estimates of the intensity of standing range from 1.5 to 2.3 metabolic equivalents (METs), neatly classifying standing as a light-intensity activity (>1.5 to <3.0 METs). Further delineation between ‘active’ and ‘passive’ standing has been proposed, with corresponding METs of >2.0 METs and ≤2.0 METs, respectively. However, this study reviews data suggesting that some standing (e.g., while performing deskwork) is substantially below the minimum light intensity activity threshold of 1.5 METs. These data bring into question whether standing should be universally classified as a light-intensity behavior. The objectives of this study are to (i) highlight discrepancies in classifying standing behavior in the human movement spectrum continuum, and (ii) to propose a realignment of the ‘active’ vs. ‘passive’ standing threshold to match the light intensity threshold to help provide a clearer research framework and subsequent public health messaging for the expected health benefits from standing.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Kowalsky & Lee Stoner & Mark A. Faghy & Bethany Barone Gibbs, 2021. "A Call to Clarify the Intensity and Classification of Standing Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-5, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8460-:d:612019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8460-:d:612019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.