IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8173-d607026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helicobacter pylori Infection: Comparison of Knowledge between Health Science and Non-Health Science University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Taghreed A. Hafiz

    (Clinical Laboratory Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

  • Juliana Linnette D’Sa

    (Maternal and Child Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sahar Zamzam

    (Maternal and Child Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
    Obstetric and Gynaecologic Nursing Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Maria Liza Visbal Dionaldo

    (Metro Technology Centers, Oklahoma City, OK 73111, USA)

  • Murad A. Mubaraki

    (Clinical Laboratory Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

  • Regie Buenafe Tumala

    (Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ), an important human pathogen, is classified as a human carcinogen. It is known to cause dyspepsia, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. Awareness regarding H. pylori infections in Saudi Arabia awaits investigation to reduce or even eliminate the infection that would ease the substantial burden of managing H. pylori among both malignant and non-malignant diseases. Aims : The study aims were to (1) assess the knowledge of H. pylori infection, testing, and management among undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia and (2) compare the H. pylori knowledge among health science and non-health science students. Methods: This study involved a cross-sectional online survey among 334 undergraduate students in health science and non-health science colleges at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, using a valid and reliable author-developed survey. The survey had two sections: the socio-demographic factors and knowledge items regarding H. pylori . Data were collected during the 2019–2020 academic year. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and Mann–Whitney U test. The knowledge scores were categorized as poor, fair, and good. Results: Less than 10% of the students in both groups had a good knowledge level about H. pylori. The comparison of the overall mean between both groups was non-significant. Moreover, the level of knowledge of the respondents was significantly associated with their university level ( p < 0.001), family monthly income ( p < 0.007), having heard about H. pylori infection ( p < 000.1), and a previous history of H. pylori infection ( p < 000.1). Conclusion: The overall knowledge level of Saudi undergraduate students about H. pylori infection was low. Thus, health awareness interventions through educational programs are recommended for improving their knowledge about H. pylori infection and its prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Taghreed A. Hafiz & Juliana Linnette D’Sa & Sahar Zamzam & Maria Liza Visbal Dionaldo & Murad A. Mubaraki & Regie Buenafe Tumala, 2021. "Helicobacter pylori Infection: Comparison of Knowledge between Health Science and Non-Health Science University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8173-:d:607026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8173-:d:607026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.