IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7952-d602765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fascial Manipulation Technique in the Conservative Management of Morton’s Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Biz

    (Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.)

  • Carla Stecco

    (Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.)

  • Ilaria Fantoni

    (Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Gianluca Aprile

    (Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
    Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy)

  • Stefano Giacomini

    (Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy)

  • Carmelo Pirri

    (Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy)

  • Pietro Ruggieri

    (Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Morton’s syndrome (MS) is a common cause of neuropathic chronic forefoot pain, characterised by the development of a swelling of the common digital plantar nerve, whose aetiology is not fully known. There is currently no gold standard of treatment; nonoperative management commonly involves manual therapies, orthoses therapy and infiltrative techniques, while surgery is indicated after failure of conservative measures. The present preliminary study prospectively evaluates patients affected by MS treated by Fascial Manipulation technique (FM), a noninvasive manual therapy, focused on the release of the deep fascia, reducing its stiffness. Materials and Methods: Patients with clinical and sonographic diagnosis of MS with at least a 4-month history of neuropathic symptoms underwent a cycle of three weekly FM sessions. Clinical follow-up, including VAS and AOFAS scores, was performed 21 days (T1) and 3 months (T2) after treatment. Results: Nine patients, among 28 recruited initially, completed the manual therapy sessions and relative follow-up points. This noninvasive pain treatment led to significant improvement of VAS ( p = 0.0034) and AOFAS scores ( p = 0.0240) at the first follow-up (T1). At 3-month follow-up (T2), both scores decreased slightly, remaining however superior to the pre-treatment values. Only VAS was still significant ( p = 0.0184). Conclusions: Despite the small size of the case series, this pilot study is unique in supporting Fascial Manipulation in the nonoperative treatment of MS. Further studies are needed with a large cohort of gender balanced patients to confirm the encouraging results obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Biz & Carla Stecco & Ilaria Fantoni & Gianluca Aprile & Stefano Giacomini & Carmelo Pirri & Pietro Ruggieri, 2021. "Fascial Manipulation Technique in the Conservative Management of Morton’s Syndrome: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7952-:d:602765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7952-:d:602765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.