IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7892-d601410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Leandro Tiggemann

    (School of Physical Education, Centro Universitário da Serra Gaúcha, Caxias do Sul 95.020-472, Brazil
    Universidade do Vale do Taquari, Lajeado 95.914-014, Brazil)

  • Caroline Pietta-Dias

    (Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90.690-200, Brazil)

  • Maira Cristina Wolf Schoenell

    (Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90.690-200, Brazil)

  • Matias Noll

    (Goiano Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Ceres 76.300-000, Brazil
    Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Cristine Lima Alberton

    (Department of Sports, School of Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96.055-630, Brazil)

  • Ronei Silveira Pinto

    (Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90.690-200, Brazil)

  • Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel

    (Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90.690-200, Brazil)

Abstract

Objective : The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods : Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determined by 1RM test (G%; n = 12) or to a group that trained using loads determined by RPE (GPE; n = 13). Elderly women trained for 12 weeks using five exercises performed with 2–3 sets of 8–15 repetitions. Loads progressed from 45% to 75% of 1RM (G%) and from 13 to 18 from Rating Perceived Exertion of Borg Scale (GPE). The outcome measures, 1RM and maximum repetitions (RMs with 70% 1RM), were assessed before, between and after training programs. Results : Increased 1RM value and RMs were observed in both groups (20–42%, p < 0.001 and 56–76%, p < 0.001, respectively, for %G; and 17–56%, p < 0.001 and 47–106%, p < 0.001, respectively, for GPE), without differences between them. Conclusions : Prescribing loads using the RPE and 1RM might be similarly effective for training elderly women in order to promote strength gains. As a practical application, RPE could be an additional method to determine training loads. In spite of the promising results of the present study, it is not possible to state that the use of RPE is effective in monitoring loads during sub maximal strength training in elderly and more research must be carried out to confirm it.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Leandro Tiggemann & Caroline Pietta-Dias & Maira Cristina Wolf Schoenell & Matias Noll & Cristine Lima Alberton & Ronei Silveira Pinto & Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel, 2021. "Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7892-:d:601410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7892-:d:601410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.