IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7681-d597360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Masters

    (College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 0123, Oman)

  • Teresa Loda

    (Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72001 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Finja Tervooren

    (Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72001 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Anne Herrmann-Werner

    (Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72001 Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Internationally, medical students’ Internet Addiction (IA) is widely studied. As medical students use the Internet extensively for work, we asked how researchers control for work-related Internet activity, and the extent to which this influences interpretations of “addiction” rates. A search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted on the search phrase of “medical students” and “internet addiction” in March 2020. In total, 98 studies met our criteria, 88 (90%) used Young’s Internet Addiction Test, and the studies’ IA rates ranged widely. Little note was taken of work-related activity, and, when discussed, had little to no impact on the interpretation of Internet “addiction”. Studies seldom accounted for work-related activities, researcher bias appears to influence their position, “usage” appears conflated with “addiction”, and correlations between “addiction” and negative behaviours are frequently confused with one-way causation. In spite of IA’s not being officially recognised, few researchers questioned its validity. While IA may exist among medical students, its measurement is flawed; given the use of the Internet as a crucial medical education tool, there is the risk that conscientious students will be labelled “addicted”, and poor academic performance may be attributed to this “addiction”.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Masters & Teresa Loda & Finja Tervooren & Anne Herrmann-Werner, 2021. "How Have Researchers Acknowledged and Controlled for Academic Work Activity When Measuring Medical Students’ Internet Addiction? A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7681-:d:597360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marwan Bakarman, 2017. "Internet Addiction among Senior Medical Students in King Abdulaziz University, Prevalence and Association with Depression," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(10), pages 1-60, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Etab S. Alghamdi & Alaa S. Alqarni & Maryah M. Bakarman & Abdel Moniem Mukhtar & Marwan A. Bakarman, 2019. "Use of Internet Health Information Among Students in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 1-51, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7681-:d:597360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.