IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7385-d591891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Administrative Health Data Improve the Gold Standard? Evidence from a Model of the Progression of Myocardial Infarction

Author

Listed:
  • Son Nghiem

    (Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Jonathan Williams

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Clifford Afoakwah

    (Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Quan Huynh

    (Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Shu-kay Ng

    (Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

  • Joshua Byrnes

    (Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia)

Abstract

Background : Myocardial infarction (MI), remains one of the leading causes of death and disability globally but publications on the progression of MI using data from the real world are limited. Multistate models have been widely used to estimate transition rates between disease states to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. We apply a Bayesian multistate hidden Markov model to investigate the progression of MI using a longitudinal dataset from Queensland, Australia. Objective : To apply a new model to investigate the progression of myocardial infarction (MI) and to show the potential to use administrative data for economic evaluation and modeling disease progression. Methods : The cohort includes 135,399 patients admitted to public hospitals in Queensland, Australia, in 2010 treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Any subsequent hospitalizations of these patients were followed until 2015. This study focused on the sub-cohort of 8705 patients hospitalized for MI. We apply a Bayesian multistate hidden Markov model to estimate transition rates between health states of MI patients and adjust for delayed enrolment biases and misclassification errors. We also estimate the association between age, sex, and ethnicity with the progression of MI. Results : On average, the risk of developing Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was 8.7%, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was 4.3%. The risk varied with age, sex, and ethnicity. The progression rates to STEMI or NSTEMI were higher among males, Indigenous, or elderly patients. For example, the risk of STEMI among males was 4.35%, while the corresponding figure for females was 3.71%. After adjustment for misclassification, the probability of STEMI increased by 1.2%, while NSTEMI increased by 1.4%. Conclusions : This study shows that administrative health data were useful to estimate factors determining the risk of MI and the progression of this health condition. It also shows that misclassification may cause the incidence of MI to be under-estimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Son Nghiem & Jonathan Williams & Clifford Afoakwah & Quan Huynh & Shu-kay Ng & Joshua Byrnes, 2021. "Can Administrative Health Data Improve the Gold Standard? Evidence from a Model of the Progression of Myocardial Infarction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7385-:d:591891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7385-:d:591891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.