IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7375-d591782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Service Evaluation of the Military HeadFIT Initiative: An Implementation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Amber McKenzie

    (King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK)

  • Bethany Croak

    (King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK)

  • Laura Rafferty

    (King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK)

  • Neil Greenberg

    (King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK)

  • Sharon A. M. Stevelink

    (King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK
    Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK)

Abstract

(1) Background: UK Armed Forces personnel provide first response, support and protection during national and international disasters and conflicts. They thus have a psychologically challenging role which requires them to maintain a good state of mental health and wellbeing. HeadFIT is a preventative initiative developed to help foster mental fitness through various self-help tools and resources online including techniques to de-stress and increase drive. This paper reports on an independent service evaluation of HeadFIT to examine feasibility and acceptability among Ministry of Defence (MOD) personnel. (2) Methods: Qualitative interviews were held with the HeadFIT beneficiaries, including military personnel and civil servants. The beneficiaries provided feedback on HeadFIT through questionnaires and interviews, and website traffic data were also collected. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. (3) Results: Beneficiaries generally reported positive views on the HeadFIT initiative, with most agreeing that the tools could support them to foster their mental fitness. However, concerns were raised around the uptake of HeadFIT and participants suggested methods to improve usability. (4) Conclusions: Several recommendations were made to improve the resources, usability, uptake, and implementation and communication of HeadFIT.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber McKenzie & Bethany Croak & Laura Rafferty & Neil Greenberg & Sharon A. M. Stevelink, 2021. "A Service Evaluation of the Military HeadFIT Initiative: An Implementation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7375-:d:591782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7375-:d:591782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.