IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7326-d590835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of a Smartphone Application Measuring Snoring in Adults—How Smart Is It Actually?

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Klaus

    (Department of Orthodontics, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

  • Anna-Lena Stummer

    (Department of Orthodontics, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Diakonie Klinikum Jung-Stilling Siegen, 57074 Siegen, Germany)

  • Sabine Ruf

    (Department of Orthodontics, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany)

Abstract

About 40% of the adult population is affected by snoring, which is closely related to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and can be associated with serious health implications. Commercial smartphone applications (apps) offer the possibility of monitoring snoring at home. However, the number of validation studies addressing snoring apps is limited. The purpose of the present study was to assess the accuracy of recorded snoring using the free version of the app SnoreLab (Reviva Softworks Ltd., London, UK) in comparison to a full-night polygraphic measurement (Miniscreen plus, Löwenstein Medical GmbH & Co., KG, Bad Ems, Germany). Nineteen healthy adult volunteers (4 female, 15 male, mean age: 38.9 ± 19.4 years) underwent simultaneous polygraphic and SnoreLab app measurement for one night at home. Parameters obtained by the SnoreLab app were: starting/ending time of monitoring, time in bed, duration and percent of quiet sleep, light, loud and epic snoring, total snoring time and Snore Score, a specific score obtained by the SnoreLab app. Data obtained from polygraphy were: starting/ending time of monitoring, time in bed, total snoring time, snore index (SI), snore index obstructive (SI obstructive) and apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI). For different thresholds of percentage snoring per night, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Comparison of methods was undertaken by Spearman-Rho correlations and Bland-Altman plots. The SnoreLab app provides acceptable accuracy values measuring snoring >50% per night: 94.7% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, 66.6% positive prediction value and 100% negative prediction value. Best agreement between both methods was achieved in comparing the sum of loud and epic snoring ratios obtained by the SnoreLab app with the total snoring ratio measured by polygraphy. Obstructive events could not be detected by the SnoreLab app. Compared to polygraphy, the SnoreLab app provides acceptable accuracy values regarding the measurement of especially heavy snoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Klaus & Anna-Lena Stummer & Sabine Ruf, 2021. "Accuracy of a Smartphone Application Measuring Snoring in Adults—How Smart Is It Actually?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7326-:d:590835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7326-:d:590835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.