IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6994-d585371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilena Ivanova

    (Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Ivan Chenchev

    (Center of Dental Implantology, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Stefan Zlatev

    (CAD/CAM Center of Dental Medicine, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Eitan Mijiritsky

    (Head and Neck Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otoryngology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 699350, Israel)

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length. Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4 months, a total of 90 implants were placed. CBCT scans were assigned prior to implant placement in order to assess the bone density. During the surgical re-entry, a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Immediately after implant insertion, the primary stability was measured. The secondary stability was measured 4 months after implant placement. Results: Primary stability showed a significant positive linear correlation with bone density (r = 0.471, p < 0.001) as well as with percentage of new bone formation (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). An average significant association of secondary stability with bone density (rs = 0.498, p < 0.001) and percentage of newly formed bone (r = 0.477, p < 0.001) was revealed. The mean values of primary stability in all three implant sizes, regarding the diameter of the implants, were similar (narrow 67.75; standard 66.78; wide 71.21) with no significant difference ( p = 0.262). The same tendency was observed for secondary stability (narrow 73.83; standard 75.25; wide 74.93), with no significant difference ( p = 0.277). Conclusions: The study revealed a high correlation between primary and secondary implant stability, and bone density, as well as with the percentage of vital bone formation. Implant length and diameter revealed no linear correlation with the implant stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilena Ivanova & Ivan Chenchev & Stefan Zlatev & Eitan Mijiritsky, 2021. "Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6994-:d:585371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6994-:d:585371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.