IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6747-d580423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Nurses Regarding Physical Restraint: Survey Results from Psychiatric Inpatient Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Tsz-Kai Lee

    (Department of Psychiatry, Tai Po Hospital, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
    School of Nursing, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China)

  • Maritta Välimäki

    (Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
    Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland)

  • Tella Lantta

    (Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland)

Abstract

There is a considerable amount of literature describing how nurses’ knowledge contributes to their attitudes and practices related to patient physical restraint. However, whether or not there have been any improvements in nurses’ knowledge levels, attitudes or practices regarding physical restraint during the past few years is unknown. A survey was conducted on nurses ( n = 133) in one psychiatric hospital in Hong Kong ( n = 98, response rate = 74%). The data were analyzed using independent t-tests, ANOVA, a Mann–Whitney U test, a Kruskal–Wallis test and Spearman’s rho. In general, nurses had good restraint-related knowledge with satisfactory attitudes and practices, although their knowledge levels, attitudes, and practices regarding restraint varied. Having a higher age, seniority, and education level contributed to a higher restraint-related knowledge level. Male nurses demonstrated more desirable practices (i.e., care of restrained patients), while nurses with a higher education level were more likely to avoid restraint. Nurses’ restraint-related knowledge positively correlated with restraint practices. Although nurses’ knowledge levels, attitudes, and practices regarding restraint were found to be satisfactory, more training efforts should focus on young nurses working in psychiatric settings with less work experience and lower education levels. As some nurses seem to favor the use of restraint with limited reflection, more studies are needed to verify nurses’ emotions and how their emotions influence the use of restrictive practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsz-Kai Lee & Maritta Välimäki & Tella Lantta, 2021. "The Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Nurses Regarding Physical Restraint: Survey Results from Psychiatric Inpatient Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6747-:d:580423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chun-Chi Hsu & Hung-Yu Chan, 2018. "Factors associated with prolonged length of stay in the psychiatric emergency service," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maritta Välimäki & Yuen Ting Joyce Lam & Kirsi Hipp & Po Yee Ivy Cheng & Tony Ng & Glendy Ip & Paul Lee & Teris Cheung & Daniel Bressington & Tella Lantta, 2022. "Physical Restraint Events in Psychiatric Hospitals in Hong Kong: A Cohort Register Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maritta Välimäki & Yuen Ting Joyce Lam & Kirsi Hipp & Po Yee Ivy Cheng & Tony Ng & Glendy Ip & Paul Lee & Teris Cheung & Daniel Bressington & Tella Lantta, 2022. "Physical Restraint Events in Psychiatric Hospitals in Hong Kong: A Cohort Register Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6747-:d:580423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.