IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6693-d579356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scalable Screening and Treatment Response Monitoring for Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Waqas

    (Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)

  • Abid Malik

    (Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44210, Pakistan)

  • Najia Atif

    (Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44210, Pakistan)

  • Anum Nisar

    (School of Nursing, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Huma Nazir

    (Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad 44210, Pakistan)

  • Siham Sikander

    (Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
    Health Services Academy, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Joint last authors.)

  • Atif Rahman

    (Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
    Joint last authors.)

Abstract

Common perinatal mental disorders such as anxiety and depression are a public health concern in low- and middle-income countries. Several tools exist for screening and monitoring treatment responses, which have frequently been tested globally in clinical and research settings. However, these tools are relatively long and not practical for integration into routine data systems in most settings. This study aims to address this gap by considering three short tools: The Community Informant Detection Tool (CIDT) for the identification of women at risk, the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) for screening women at high-risk, and the 4-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-4) for measuring treatment responses. Studies in rural Pakistan showed that the CIDT offered a valid and reliable key-informant approach for the detection of perinatal depression by utilizing a network of peers and local health workers, yielding a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 82.4%. The PHQ-4 had excellent psychometric properties to screen women with perinatal depression through trained community health workers, with a sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 91.70%. The HAMD-4 provided a good model fit and unidimensional construct for assessing intervention responses. These short, reliable, and valid tools are scalable and expected to reduce training, administrative and human resource costs to health systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Waqas & Abid Malik & Najia Atif & Anum Nisar & Huma Nazir & Siham Sikander & Atif Rahman, 2021. "Scalable Screening and Treatment Response Monitoring for Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6693-:d:579356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Waqas & Nahal Raza & Haneen Wajid Lodhi & Zerwah Muhammad & Mehak Jamal & Abdul Rehman, 2015. "Psychosocial Factors of Antenatal Anxiety and Depression in Pakistan: Is Social Support a Mediator?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asiya K Kazi & Armaan A Rowther & Najia Atif & Huma Nazir & Maria Atiq & Shaffaq Zulfiqar & Abid Malik & Pamela J Surkan, 2021. "Intersections between patient-provider communication and antenatal anxiety in a public healthcare setting in Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Armaan A Rowther & Asiya K Kazi & Huma Nazir & Maria Atiq & Najia Atif & Nida Rauf & Abid Malik & Pamela J Surkan, 2020. "“A Woman Is a Puppet.” Women’s Disempowerment and Prenatal Anxiety in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study of Sources, Mitigators, and Coping Strategies for Anxiety in Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy & Anupama Jithesh & Sonia Chaabane & Amit Abraham & Karima Chaabna & Sohaila Cheema, 2020. "Perinatal Mental Illness in the Middle East and North Africa Region—A Systematic Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Abel Fekadu Dadi & Emma R Miller & Lillian Mwanri, 2020. "Antenatal depression and its association with adverse birth outcomes in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6693-:d:579356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.