IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6352-d573461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of the Adult Self-Report and the Adult Behavior Checklist Form to Chinese Adults: Syndrome Structure, Inter-Informant Agreement, and Cultural Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Jianghong Liu

    (Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Fanghong Dong

    (Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Christopher M. Lee

    (Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Jenny Reyes

    (Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Masha Ivanova

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

Abstract

Given the global public health burden of mental illness, there is a critical need for culturally validated psychopathology assessment tools that perform well in diverse societies. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Adult Self-Report (ASR) and Adult Behavioral Checklist (ABCL) from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessments in adults in China. Chinese adults (N = 1276) and their spouses completed the ASR and ABCL, respectively. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis on 99 ASR items and 93 ABCL items. Estimators of model fit confirmed that both measures demonstrated excellent fit (e.g., root mean square error of approximation = 0.016 and 0.018, respectively). Syndrome loadings on both measures were satisfactory but generally higher on the ASR. Neither gender nor education had significant effects, but there were informant x gender effects on most problem scales. Cross-informant agreement correlations between the ASR and ABCL were medium to large. Findings from this novel sample of Chinese adults are consistent with previous validation studies supporting the dimensionality, syndrome structure, gender differences, and inter-informant agreement of the ASR and ABCL. Our findings contribute to the cross-cultural understanding of mental health assessment and offer a psychometrically sound approach to measuring adult psychopathology in Chinese populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianghong Liu & Fanghong Dong & Christopher M. Lee & Jenny Reyes & Masha Ivanova, 2021. "The Application of the Adult Self-Report and the Adult Behavior Checklist Form to Chinese Adults: Syndrome Structure, Inter-Informant Agreement, and Cultural Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6352-:d:573461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianghong Liu & Xin Qiao & Fanghong Dong & Adrian Raine, 2018. "The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6352-:d:573461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.