IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5436-d557891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Toplitsch

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Sabine Platzer

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Romana Zehner

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Stephanie Maitz

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Franz Mascher

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Clemens Kittinger

    (Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

The difficulty of cultivation of Legionella spp. from water samples remains a strenuous task even for experienced laboratories. The long incubation periods for Legionellae make isolation difficult. In addition, the water samples themselves are often contaminated with accompanying microbial flora, and therefore require complex cultivation methods from diagnostic laboratories. In addition to the recent update of the standard culture method ISO 11731:2017, new strategies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) are often discussed as alternatives or additions to conventional Legionella culture approaches. In this study, we compared ISO 11731:2017 with qPCR assays targeting Legionella spp., Legionella pneumophila , and Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. In samples with a high burden of accompanying microbial flora, qPCR shows an excellent negative predictive value for Legionella pneumophila , thus making qPCR an excellent tool for pre-selection of negative samples prior to work-intensive culture methods. This and its low limit of detection make qPCR a diagnostic asset in Legionellosis outbreak investigations, where quick-risk assessments are essential, and are a useful method for monitoring risk sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Toplitsch & Sabine Platzer & Romana Zehner & Stephanie Maitz & Franz Mascher & Clemens Kittinger, 2021. "Comparison of Updated Methods for Legionella Detection in Environmental Water Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5436-:d:557891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5436-:d:557891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.