IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2897-d348944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ladder Safety: A Taxonomy of Limb-Movement Patterns for Three Points of Control

Author

Listed:
  • Roger C. Jensen

    (Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene Department, Montana Technological University, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

  • Charles J. Holland

    (Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene Department, Montana Technological University, Butte, MT 59701, USA)

Abstract

Traditional guidance on ladder safety emphasizes training workers on the use of three points of contact. More recent guidance is to train workers to use three points of control. What is lacking is empirical information about what limb-movement patterns effectively support the use of three points of control. This project was conducted to establish a taxonomy of possible limb-movement patterns and a means for comparing relative safety. Prior to the experiment, a taxonomy of six possible limb-movement patterns was established. A sample of 20 undergraduate students performed four tasks each without any instructions on limb-movement pattern. The tasks were ascending and descending a straight ladder and a portable ladder, once each, while being videotaped. Out of 80 observed tasks, 59 of the subjects were using rungs rather than rails. Analysis of rung users identified the use of all six patterns. An innovative measure of safe performance was developed and used to compare the patterns. Statistical analysis did not find significant differences in the patterns based on the safety performance measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger C. Jensen & Charles J. Holland, 2020. "Ladder Safety: A Taxonomy of Limb-Movement Patterns for Three Points of Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2897-:d:348944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel Hernández-García & María Isabel Gil-López & David Martínez-Pozo & María Teresa Martínez-Romero & Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento & Antonio Cejudo & Pilar Sainz de Baranda & Chris Bishop, 2020. "Validity and Reliability of the New Basic Functional Assessment Protocol (BFA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-35, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2897-:d:348944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.