IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2776-d346935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Complications in Midwives Participating in Pregnancy Termination Procedures—Polish Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Kornelia Zaręba

    (First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jolanta Banasiewicz

    (Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Hanna Rozenek

    (Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Ciebiera

    (Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Jakiel

    (First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Background : Ethically controversial medical procedures, such as the termination of pregnancy, are frequently associated with a discrepancy between personal attitude and values versus requirements related to a professional situation. The study aimed to assess emotional complications in midwives participating in pregnancy termination procedures. Methods: The study included 181 midwives working in state-governed healthcare facilities in central and eastern Poland. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the present authors’ own questionnaire were used in the study. The results indicating the level of occupational burnout were presented in two scales: the exhaustion scale and the disengagement scale. Results: The study revealed that 48% of midwives had never participated in pregnancy termination procedures due to fetal defects. The level of occupational burnout described with the exhaustion factor (t = 2.06; p < 0.041) and disengagement factor (t = 2.96; p < 0.003) was significantly higher in the group of midwives participating in pregnancy termination procedures due to fetal defects than in the group of midwives who did not participate in pregnancy terminations. The most common factors contributing to burnout reported by midwives who participated in pregnancy terminations were: moral dilemmas (68%), seeing the aborted fetus (65%), anticipating the child’s death in case it was born with signs of life (59%) and the lack of professional psychological support for medical personnel (56%). Conclusions: Importantly, pregnancy termination should be performed by persons who find such procedures acceptable from the viewpoint of their value system. It is a protective factor in regards to work with women who undergo terminations. Moreover, developing a system of informational and psychological support for midwives participating in pregnancy termination procedures is also a significant aspect.

Suggested Citation

  • Kornelia Zaręba & Jolanta Banasiewicz & Hanna Rozenek & Michał Ciebiera & Grzegorz Jakiel, 2020. "Emotional Complications in Midwives Participating in Pregnancy Termination Procedures—Polish Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2776-:d:346935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Zgliczyńska & Stanisław Zgliczyński & Michał Ciebiera & Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska, 2019. "Occupational Burnout Syndrome in Polish Physicians: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2776-:d:346935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.