IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p977-d316486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Screening Uptake among Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-Degree Relatives at Elevated Risk to Breast Cancer: Results and Implications of a Randomized Study in the State of Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Lipscomb

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Cam Escoffery

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Theresa W. Gillespie

    (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Department of Surgery and Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • S. Jane Henley

    (Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Robert A. Smith

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Cancer Control Program, American Cancer Society; Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Toni Chociemski

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Lyn Almon

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Renjian Jiang

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Xi Sheng

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Michael Goodman

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Kevin C. Ward

    (Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

Abstract

Women diagnosed with breast cancer at a relatively early age (≤45 years) or with bilateral disease at any age are at elevated risk for additional breast cancer, as are their female first-degree relatives (FDRs). We report on a randomized trial to increase adherence to mammography screening guidelines among survivors and FDRs. From the Georgia Cancer Registry, breast cancer survivors diagnosed during 2000–2009 at six Georgia cancer centers underwent phone interviews about their breast cancer screening behaviors and their FDRs. Nonadherent survivors and FDRs meeting all inclusion criteria were randomized to high-intensity (evidence-based brochure, phone counseling, mailed reminders, and communications with primary care providers) or low-intensity interventions (brochure only). Three and 12-month follow-up questionnaires were completed. Data analyses used standard statistical approaches. Among 1055 survivors and 287 FDRs who were located, contacted, and agreed to participate, 59.5% and 62.7%, respectively, reported breast cancer screening in the past 12 months and were thus ineligible. For survivors enrolled at baseline ( N = 95), the proportion reporting adherence to guideline screening by 12 months post-enrollment was similar in the high and low-intensity arms (66.7% vs. 79.2%, p = 0.31). Among FDRs enrolled at baseline ( N = 83), screening was significantly higher in the high-intensity arm at 12 months (60.9% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.03). Overall, about 72% of study-eligible survivors (all of whom were screening nonadherent at baseline) reported screening within 12 months of study enrollment. For enrolled FDRs receiving the high-intensity intervention, over 60% reported guideline screening by 12 months. A major conclusion is that using high-quality central cancer registries to identify high-risk breast cancer survivors and then working closely with these survivors to identify their FDRs represents a feasible and effective strategy to promote guideline cancer screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Lipscomb & Cam Escoffery & Theresa W. Gillespie & S. Jane Henley & Robert A. Smith & Toni Chociemski & Lyn Almon & Renjian Jiang & Xi Sheng & Michael Goodman & Kevin C. Ward, 2020. "Improving Screening Uptake among Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-Degree Relatives at Elevated Risk to Breast Cancer: Results and Implications of a Randomized Study in the State of Georgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:977-:d:316486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen-Yu Huang & Min Cheng & Na-Rong Lee & Hsin-Yi Huang & Wen-Ling Lee & Wen-Hsun Chang & Peng-Hui Wang, 2020. "Comparing Paclitaxel–Carboplatin with Paclitaxel–Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:977-:d:316486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.