IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9553-d465438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical Characteristics of Atmospheric PM 10 and PM 2.5 at a Rural Site of Lijiang City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Liu

    (School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Xurui Li

    (School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

  • Wan Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Baohui Yin

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Yuanguan Gao

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Xiaoyang Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

Emissions from biomass burning are very serious in Southeast Asia and South Asia in April. In order to explore the effect of long-range transport of biomass emissions from the Indochina Peninsula in Southwest China during the period of the southeast monsoon season and to find out the main pollution sources in local atmospheric PM 2.5 , a field campaign was conducted from 6–26 April 2011 in Lijiang, China. Twenty-four-hour PM 10 and PM 2.5 filter samples were collected, and inorganic ions, elements, and carbonaceous components (including organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitrated PAHs (NPAHs)) were measured. The monthly mean mass concentrations of particulate matter (PM) were 40.4 and 14.4 μg/m 3 for PM 10 and PM 2.5 , respectively. The monthly mean concentrations of OC and EC in PM 10 were 6.2 and 1.6 μg/m 3 , respectively. The weekly mean concentrations of ∑PAHs and ∑NPAHs were 11.9 ng/m 3 and 289 pg/m 3 , respectively, in atmospheric PM 10 of Lijiang. The diagnostic ratios of PAH and NPAH isomers were used to analyze the sources of PAHs and NPAHs in PM 10 . The ratios of Benz(a)anthracene/(Chrysene+Benz(a)anthracen), Fluoranthene/(Fluoranthene+Pyrene) and Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene/(Benzo(g,h,i)perylene+Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) were 0.45 ± 0.04, 0.61 ± 0.01, and 0.53 ± 0.03, respectively, indicating the contribution from coal combustion and biomass burning. The 1-nitropyrene/Pyrene (1-NP/Pyr) ratio was 0.004 ± 0.001, suggesting that the contribution to NPAHs mainly came from coal combustion. Sulfate was the most prominent inorganic ionic species, with monthly mean levels of 2.28 and 1.39 μg/m 3 in PM 10 and PM 2.5 , respectively. The monthly mean mass ratios of NO 3 − /SO 4 2− were 0.40 and 0.23 in PM 10 and PM 2.5 , respectively, indicating that the contribution of atmospheric anions from coal combustion sources was much more important than that from other sources. Based on the relatively high SO 4 2− concentrations and low NO 3 − /SO 4 2− ratios, combined with the data analysis of isomer ratios of PAHs and NPAHs, we can conclude that coal combustion, traffic, and dust were the major contributors to local atmospheric PM in Lijiang city, while biomass burning may also have contributed to local atmospheric PM in Lijiang city to some degree.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Liu & Xurui Li & Wan Wang & Baohui Yin & Yuanguan Gao & Xiaoyang Yang, 2020. "Chemical Characteristics of Atmospheric PM 10 and PM 2.5 at a Rural Site of Lijiang City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9553-:d:465438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9553-:d:465438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.