IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8941-d454626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foresight for the Fitness Sector: Results from a European Delphi Study and Its Relevance in the Time of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Moustakas

    (Institute for European Sport Development and Leisure Studies, German Sport University, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Anna Szumilewicz

    (Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Xian Mayo

    (Observatory of Healthy and Active Living of Spain Active Foundation, Centre for Sport Studies, King Juan Carlos University, 28942 Madrid, Spain)

  • Elisabeth Thienemann

    (Independent Scholar, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Andrew Grant

    (Independent Consultant, Sunderland SR5 1SN, UK)

Abstract

The fitness sector is an essential player in the promotion of physical activity and healthy behaviour in Europe. However, the sector is confronted with numerous socio-demographic trends that will shape its ability to be financially successful and contribute to public health. The sector must understand current drivers of change and the skills its workforce needs to navigate them. As such, using the results of a 2019 Delphi Survey of over 50 fitness experts from 26 countries, we aim to define the drivers of change facing the sector and identify the skills needed by the fitness workforce to navigate these changes. We find that several technological, social, health and economic trends affect the sector. As a result, so-called soft skills such as communication or customer service, along with digital technology skills, are becoming increasingly important. There is also growing recognition that fitness professionals need to be trained to work with a number of special populations. Furthermore, we argue that many of the trends identified here—such as the increasing use of technology or the focus on individual customer needs—have been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We conclude by arguing that well-developed, pan-European qualifications are needed to address these common issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Moustakas & Anna Szumilewicz & Xian Mayo & Elisabeth Thienemann & Andrew Grant, 2020. "Foresight for the Fitness Sector: Results from a European Delphi Study and Its Relevance in the Time of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8941-:d:454626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eszter Füzéki & Theresa Weber & David A. Groneberg & Winfried Banzer, 2020. "Physical Activity Counseling in Primary Care in Germany—An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Anabela G. Silva & Patrícia Simões & Alexandra Queirós & Nelson P Rocha & Mário Rodrigues, 2020. "Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emanuela Gualdi-Russo & Luciana Zaccagni, 2021. "Physical Activity for Health and Wellness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-6, July.
    2. Karen Kaijuan Xu & Kenny Kuanchou Chen & Euisoo Kim & Jerónimo García-Fernández & John Nauright & James J. Zhang, 2021. "Dimensions of Service Quality in Health-Fitness Clubs in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mezna A. AlMarzooqi & Franziska Saller, 2022. "Physical Activity Counseling in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review of Content, Outcomes, and Barriers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8941-:d:454626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.