IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7559-d430470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Wrist Percooling on Physiological and Perceptual Responses during a Running Time Trial Performance in the Heat

Author

Listed:
  • Kelsey Denby

    (Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Ronald Caruso

    (Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Emily Schlicht

    (Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Stephen J. Ives

    (Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

Abstract

Environmental heat stress poses significant physiological challenge and impairs exercise performance. We investigated the impact of wrist percooling on running performance and physiological and perceptual responses in the heat. In a counterbalanced design, 13 trained males (33 ± 9 years, 15 ± 7% body fat, and maximal oxygen consumption, VO 2 max 59 ± 5 mL/kg/min) completed three 10 km running time trials (27 °C, 60% relative humidity) while wearing two cooling bands: (1) both bands were off (off/off), (2) one band on (off/on), (3) both bands on (on/on). Heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV), mean arterial pressure (MAP), core temperature (T CO ), thermal sensation (TS), and fatigue (VAS) were recorded at baseline and recovery, while running speed (RS) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected during the 10 km. Wrist cooling had no effect ( p > 0.05) at rest, except modestly increased HR (3–5 ∆beats/min, p < 0.05). Wrist percooling increased ( p < 0.05) RS (0.25 ∆mi/h) and HR (5 ∆beats/min), but not T CO (∆ 0.3 °C), RPE, or TS. Given incomplete trials, the distance achieved at 16 min was not different between conditions (off/off 1.96 ± 0.16 vs. off/on 1.98 ± 0.19 vs. on/on 1.99 ± 0.24 miles, p = 0.490). During recovery HRV, MAP, or fatigue were unaffected ( p > 0.05). We demonstrate that wrist percooling elicited a faster running speed, though this coincides with increased HR; although, interestingly, sensations of effort and thermal comfort were unaffected, despite the faster speed and higher HR.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelsey Denby & Ronald Caruso & Emily Schlicht & Stephen J. Ives, 2020. "The Impact of Wrist Percooling on Physiological and Perceptual Responses during a Running Time Trial Performance in the Heat," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7559-:d:430470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7559/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7559/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Cyle Phillips & Derek Verbrigghe & Alex Gabe & Brittany Jauquet & Claire Eischer & Tejin Yoon, 2020. "The Influence of Thermal Alterations on Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Neuromuscular Function during a Fatiguing Task," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catarina N. Matias & Stefania Toselli & Cristina P. Monteiro & Francesco Campa, 2022. "Editorial: New Training Strategies and Evaluation Methods for Improving Health and Physical Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-4, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangyuan Tian & Hongxia Li & Shuicheng Tian & Chenning Tian & Jiang Shao, 2022. "Is There a Difference in Brain Functional Connectivity between Chinese Coal Mine Workers Who Have Engaged in Unsafe Behavior and Those Who Have Not?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7559-:d:430470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.