IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6776-d414833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indoor Radon Measurements Using Radon Track Detectors and Electret Ionization Chambers in the Bauxite-Bearing Areas of Southern Adamawa, Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Saïdou

    (Nuclear Technology Section, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Yaounde P.O. Box 4110, Cameroon
    Faculty of Science, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde P.O. Box 812, Cameroon)

  • Oumar Bobbo Modibo

    (Nuclear Technology Section, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Yaounde P.O. Box 4110, Cameroon
    Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, 66-1 Honcho, Hirosaki-shi, Aomori 036-8564, Japan)

  • Ndjana Nkoulou II Joseph Emmanuel

    (Nuclear Technology Section, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Yaounde P.O. Box 4110, Cameroon)

  • Olga German

    (Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, Department of Nuclear Safety and Security, International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 100, 1400, Wagramer strasse, 1020 Vienna, Austria)

  • Kountchou Noube Michaux

    (Nuclear Technology Section, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Yaounde P.O. Box 4110, Cameroon)

  • Hamadou Yerima Abba

    (Nuclear Technology Section, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Yaounde P.O. Box 4110, Cameroon)

Abstract

The current work deals with indoor radon ( 222 Rn) concentrations and ambient dose-equivalent rate measurements in the bauxite-bearing areas of the Adamawa region in Cameroon before mining from 2022. In total, 90 Electret Ionization Chambers (EIC) (commercially, EPERM) and 175 Radon Track Detectors (commercially, RADTRAK 2 ) were used to measure 222 Rn concentrations in dwellings of four localities of the above region. A pocket survey meter (RadEye PRD-ER, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the ambient dose-equivalent rate measurements. These measurements were followed by calculations of annual doses from inhalation and external exposure. 222 Rn concentrations were found to vary between 36 ± 8–687 ± 35 Bq m −3 with a geometric mean (GM) of 175 ± 16 Bq m −3 and 43 ± 12–270 ± 40 Bq m −3 with a geometric mean of 101 ± 21 Bq m −3 by using EPERM and RADTRAK, respectively. According to RADTRAK data, 51% of dwellings have radon concentrations above the reference level of 100 Bq m −3 recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The ambient dose equivalent rate ranged between 0.04–0.17 µSv h −1 with the average value of 0.08 µSv h −1 . The inhalation dose and annual external effective dose to the public were assessed and found to vary between 0.8–5 mSv with an average value of 2 mSv and 0.3–1.8 mSv with an average value of 0.7 mSv, respectively. Most of the average values in terms of concentration and radiation dose were found to be above the corresponding world averages given by the United Nations Scientific Commission on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Even though the current exposure of members of the public to natural radiation is not critical, the situation could change abruptly when mining starts.

Suggested Citation

  • Saïdou & Oumar Bobbo Modibo & Ndjana Nkoulou II Joseph Emmanuel & Olga German & Kountchou Noube Michaux & Hamadou Yerima Abba, 2020. "Indoor Radon Measurements Using Radon Track Detectors and Electret Ionization Chambers in the Bauxite-Bearing Areas of Southern Adamawa, Cameroon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6776-:d:414833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irene Calvente & María Isabel Núñez & Rachid Chahboun Karimi & Juan Villalba-Moreno, 2021. "Survey of Radon Concentrations in the University of Granada in Southern Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6776-:d:414833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.