IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6628-d412262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Acceptance of Aquaculture in Spain: An Instrument to Achieve Sustainability for Society

Author

Listed:
  • José Ruiz-Chico

    (INDESS (University Institute for Sustainable Social Development), University of Cadiz, 11406 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
    Department of General Economy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, University of Cadiz, Avda. de la Universidad, 4-11406 Jerez de la Frontera (Cadiz), Spain)

  • José M. Biedma-Ferrer

    (INDESS (University Institute for Sustainable Social Development), University of Cadiz, 11406 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
    Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, University of Cadiz, Avda. de la Universidad, 4-11406 Jerez de la Frontera (Cadiz), Spain)

  • Antonio R. Peña-Sánchez

    (INDESS (University Institute for Sustainable Social Development), University of Cadiz, 11406 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
    Department of General Economy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, University of Cadiz, Avda. de la Universidad, 4-11406 Jerez de la Frontera (Cadiz), Spain)

  • Mercedes Jiménez-García

    (INDESS (University Institute for Sustainable Social Development), University of Cadiz, 11406 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
    Department of General Economy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, University of Cadiz, Avda. de la Universidad, 4-11406 Jerez de la Frontera (Cadiz), Spain)

Abstract

Aquaculture is a technique to produce food that is under debate, due to its possible consequences for altering the economy, traditional fishing included, or the environment, even with doubts about the health of consumers. This document studies its social acceptance from the point of view of carrying capacity. This term is defined as the level at which this activity begins to be disproportionate and poses important disadvantages for society. In this context, we conducted 803 surveys in six coastal provinces in Spain. The results show that the acceptance of these products is good, implying that aquaculture is far from reaching its saturation point in society. Additionally, the respondents gave a higher priority to socio-economic objectives than to environmental ones. We can conclude that the further development of this sector is advisable in these provinces. The general perception of aquaculture is better among men, and also among higher-income consumers. Informative activities should be organized to target these more hesitant groups. Production structures should be revised to overcome biases in the population about the idea that the food obtained from aquaculture harms the environment or is less natural or healthy. The possible abuse of feed and chemicals spreads this idea, and this could affect the taste and quality adversely.

Suggested Citation

  • José Ruiz-Chico & José M. Biedma-Ferrer & Antonio R. Peña-Sánchez & Mercedes Jiménez-García, 2020. "Social Acceptance of Aquaculture in Spain: An Instrument to Achieve Sustainability for Society," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6628-:d:412262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byron, Carrie & Bengtson, David & Costa-Pierce, Barry & Calanni, John, 2011. "Integrating science into management: Ecological carrying capacity of bivalve shellfish aquaculture," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 363-370, May.
    2. Whitmarsh, David & Palmieri, Maria Giovanna, 2009. "Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 452-457, May.
    3. Byron, Carrie & Link, Jason & Costa-Pierce, Barry & Bengtson, David, 2011. "Calculating ecological carrying capacity of shellfish aquaculture using mass-balance modeling: Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1743-1755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa R. Johnson & Kate Beard & Damian C. Brady & Carrie J. Byron & Caitlin Cleaver & Kevin Duffy & Nicholas Keeney & Melissa Kimble & Molly Miller & Shane Moeykens & Mario Teisl & G. Peter van Walsu, 2019. "A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Yi-ping Fang & Fu-biao Zhu & Shu-hua Yi & Xiao-ping Qiu & Yong-jiang Ding, 2021. "Ecological carrying capacity of alpine grassland in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on the structural dynamics method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12550-12578, August.
    3. Kluger, Lotta C. & Taylor, Marc H. & Mendo, Jaime & Tam, Jorge & Wolff, Matthias, 2016. "Carrying capacity simulations as a tool for ecosystem-based management of a scallop aquaculture system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 44-55.
    4. Yuxi Zhao & Xingguo Liu & Ming Lu & Runfeng Zhou & Zhaoyun Sun & Shuwen Xiao, 2022. "Evaluation of Trophic Structure and Energy Flow in a Pelteobagrus fulvidraco Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Pete, Romain & Guyondet, Thomas & Bec, Beatrice & Derolez, Valérie & Cesmat, Ludovic & Lagarde, Franck & Pouvreau, Stéphane & Fiandrino, Annie & Richard, Marion, 2020. "A box-model of carrying capacity of the Thau lagoon in the context of ecological status regulations and sustainable shellfish cultures," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).
    6. Outeiro, Luis & Villasante, Sebastian & Oyarzo, Hugo, 2018. "The interplay between fish farming and nature based recreation-tourism in Southern Chile: A perception approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 90-100.
    7. Gatmiry, Zohreh S. & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Khakzar bafruei, Morteza & Soltani, Roya, 2021. "Food web conservation vs. strategic threats: A security game approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 442(C).
    8. Wang, Qiuchen & Liu, Hongyi & Ore, Fredrik & Wang, Lihui & Hauge, Jannicke Baalsrud & Meijer, Sebastiaan, 2023. "Multi-actor perspectives on human robotic collaboration implementation in the heavy automotive manufacturing industry - A Swedish case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Zhao, Yunxia & Zhang, Jihong & Lin, Fan & Ren, Jeffrey S. & Sun, Ke & Liu, Yi & Wu, Wenguang & Wang, Wei, 2019. "An ecosystem model for estimating shellfish production carrying capacity in bottom culture systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Peggy Schrobback & Sean Pascoe & Louisa Coglan, 2014. "Shape Up or Ship Out: Can We Enhance Productivity in Coastal Aquaculture to Compete with Other Uses?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Byron, Carrie & Link, Jason & Costa-Pierce, Barry & Bengtson, David, 2011. "Calculating ecological carrying capacity of shellfish aquaculture using mass-balance modeling: Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1743-1755.
    12. Kodikara, P.N. & Perera, B.J.C. & Kularathna, M.D.U.P., 2010. "Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis - A case study on urban water supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 209-220, October.
    13. Hynes, Stephen & Norton, Danny & Corless, Rebecca, 2013. "Public Perceptions of the Irish Marine Environment," Working Papers 160056, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    14. Ofir, E. & Gal, G. & Goren, M. & Shapiro, J. & Spanier, E., 2016. "Detecting changes to the functioning of a lake ecosystem following a regime shift based on static food-web models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 145-157.
    15. Han, Dongyan & Chen, Yong & Zhang, Chongliang & Ren, Yiping & Xue, Ying & Wan, Rong, 2017. "Evaluating impacts of intensive shellfish aquaculture on a semi-closed marine ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 193-200.
    16. Kankan Wu & Keliang Chen & Yu Gao & Shang Jiang & Haiping Huang, 2022. "Applying a Set of Potential Methods for the Integrated Assessment of the Marine Eco-Environmental Carrying Capacity in Coastal Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Eleiton, Nalumu Elizabeth & Corless, Rebecca. & Hynes, Stephen, 2015. "Public Perceptions of Marine Environmental Issues: A Review," Working Papers 262590, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    18. de Melo Filho, Marcos Estevão Santiago & Owatari, Marco Shizuo & Mouriño, José Luiz Pedreira & Carciofi, Bruno Augusto Mattar & Soares, Hugo Moreira, 2020. "Empirical modeling of feed conversion in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    19. Estévez, Rodrigo A. & Gelcich, Stefan, 2015. "Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: Research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-7.
    20. Maria B. Forleo & Nadia Palmieri, 2023. "Environmental Attributes of Wild versus Farmed Tuna: Beliefs, Knowledge and Purchasing Choices of Italian Consumers of Canned Tuna," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6628-:d:412262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.