IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6345-d406632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)

Author

Listed:
  • Kyeong-Hee Choi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Min-Uk Cho

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Chae-Won Park

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Seoung-Yeon Kim

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Min-Jung Kim

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Boram Hong

    (DOTHEAL Co., Ltd., Suwon 16690, Korea)

  • Yong-Ku Kong

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

Abstract

This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups—the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor’s frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyeong-Hee Choi & Min-Uk Cho & Chae-Won Park & Seoung-Yeon Kim & Min-Jung Kim & Boram Hong & Yong-Ku Kong, 2020. "A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6345-:d:406632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilawan Kanhachon & Yodchai Boonprakob, 2021. "Modified-Active Release Therapy in Patients with Scapulocostal Syndrome and Masticatory Myofascial Pain: A Stratified-Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6345-:d:406632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.