IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6222-d404864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends and Predictors for the Uptake of Colon Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test in Spain from 2011 to 2017

Author

Listed:
  • José Javier Zamorano-Leon

    (Department of Public Health & Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana López-de-Andres

    (Preventive Medicine and Public Health Teaching and Research Unit, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana Álvarez-González

    (Obstetrics and Gynelocogy Department, Hospital Universitario Río Ortega, 47012 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Clara Maestre-Miquel

    (School of Health Sciences, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, 13071 Talavera de la Reina, Spain)

  • Paloma Astasio-Arbiza

    (Department of Public Health & Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio López-Farré

    (Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier de-Miguel-Diez

    (Respiratory Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), 28009 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rodrigo Jiménez-García

    (Department of Public Health & Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Romana Albaladejo-Vicente

    (Department of Public Health & Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background : In Spain, colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test, targeted towards the 50–69 age bracket, was implemented on different dates. We aim to assess the temporal trend of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake according to the year of screening implementation in each region and to identify predictors for the uptake of CRC screening. Methods : A cross-sectional study with 12,657 participants from the Spanish National Health Surveys 2011 and 2017 was used. Uptake rates were analyzed according to the date that the screening program was implemented. Results : For regions with programs implemented before 2011, the uptake rate increased 3.34-fold from 2011 to 2017 (9.8% vs. 32.7%; p < 0.001). For regions that implemented screening within the 2011–2016 period, the uptake rose from 4.3% to 13.2% (3.07-fold; p < 0.001), and for regions that implemented screening after 2016, the uptake increased from 3.4% to 8.8% (2.59-fold; p < 0.001). For the entire Spanish population, the uptake increased 3.21-fold (6.8% vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001). Positive predictors for uptake were older age, Spanish nationality, middle-to-high educational level, suffering chronic diseases, non-smoking and living in regions where screening programs were implemented earlier. Conclusions : The different periods for the implementation of CRC screening as well as sociodemographic and health inequalities may have limited the improvement in the screening uptake from 2011 to 2017 in Spain.

Suggested Citation

  • José Javier Zamorano-Leon & Ana López-de-Andres & Ana Álvarez-González & Clara Maestre-Miquel & Paloma Astasio-Arbiza & Antonio López-Farré & Javier de-Miguel-Diez & Rodrigo Jiménez-García & Romana Al, 2020. "Trends and Predictors for the Uptake of Colon Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test in Spain from 2011 to 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6222-:d:404864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6222-:d:404864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.