IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4829-d380458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antibiotic Resistance in Microbes from Street Fruit Drinks and Hygiene Behavior of the Vendors in Delhi, India

Author

Listed:
  • Neha Sharma

    (Amity Institute of Virology and Immunology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 301313, India)

  • Kamalpreet Singh

    (Amity Institute of Virology and Immunology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 301313, India)

  • Devinder Toor

    (Amity Institute of Virology and Immunology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 301313, India)

  • Somnath S. Pai

    (Amity Institute of Virology and Immunology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 301313, India)

  • Rishika Chakraborty

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA)

  • Khalid M. Khan

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
    Department of Population Health, College of Health Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77340, USA)

Abstract

Microbial contamination of fruit juices has caused major outbreaks, leading to significant morbidity and mortality in developing countries. The inept hygiene and safety practices followed by the juice vendors are the leading risk factors of the microbial contamination of juices. In this pilot study, the five most crowded markets in urban Delhi, including Kamla Nagar, University of Delhi (north campus), Tilak Nagar, Chandni Chowk, and Rohini, were selected for a questionnaire survey on the fruit juice vendors and the sampling of water used for juice preparation as well as sugarcane, orange, and mix fruit juices collected from these markets for the enumeration of total bacterial count (TBC), Escherichia coli, Salmonella , and Vibrio . Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed using ampicillin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem. The results indicated that the majority of the vendors were not following hygiene and safety practices when compared with the recommended standard safety practices. The use of municipal water by 95% of vendors with high TBC counts might have been the major source of microbial contamination in all types of fruit juices. E. coli and Salmonella contaminations were high in sugarcane (2 × 10 5 colony forming units (CFU)/mL) and mix fruit (2.2 × 10 5 CFU/mL) juice samples, respectively. On the other hand, Vibrio was found to be absent in almost all juice samples except for orange juice. All strains were found to be susceptible to chloramphenicol, but resistant to ampicillin and cefotaxime. Only a few strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin, and only E. coli strains were resistant to imipenem. Taken together, the overall microbiological standards of fruit juices served by street vendors were not within the acceptable limits, perhaps due to the poor quality of water used to prepare juices and poor hygiene and safety practices followed by the vendors. More importantly, the isolated microbes demonstrated resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime, which may have pressing public health implications. Post hoc power analyses identified the minimum sample size required for 80% power.

Suggested Citation

  • Neha Sharma & Kamalpreet Singh & Devinder Toor & Somnath S. Pai & Rishika Chakraborty & Khalid M. Khan, 2020. "Antibiotic Resistance in Microbes from Street Fruit Drinks and Hygiene Behavior of the Vendors in Delhi, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4829-:d:380458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4829-:d:380458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.