IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1094-d217551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Andriessen

    (Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Lennart Reifels

    (Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Karolina Krysinska

    (Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Jo Robinson

    (Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia)

  • Georgia Dempster

    (Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Jane Pirkis

    (Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

Given the increasing trend in suicide mortality and its burden on individuals, families and communities, ethically sound research is crucial to improve the prevention of suicidal behaviour. However, few studies have looked at the experiences of researchers in obtaining ethics approval for their studies. This study addressed this gap by investigating researchers’ experiences in obtaining ethics approval and how they dealt with the concerns raised by ethics committees. Respondents were recruited from September to November 2018 through the Australian Suicide Prevention Research Leaders Network, and 33 respondents (35%) completed the study survey, comprising forced-choice and open-ended questions. Respondents most commonly reported concerns from ethics committees regarding potential harm to participants and researchers’ responsibilities to participants within the context of intervention and evaluation studies. Most researchers modified their ethics application and/or consulted with their ethics committee to reply to the concerns raised. Most respondents perceived the impact of the modification as positive or neutral. The study concludes that researchers may anticipate potential concerns of ethics committees. Improved understanding of how ethics committees work and dialogue between researchers and ethics committees should sustain the quality in suicide-related research.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Andriessen & Lennart Reifels & Karolina Krysinska & Jo Robinson & Georgia Dempster & Jane Pirkis, 2019. "Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1094-:d:217551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lennart Reifels & Maria Ftanou & Karolina Krysinska & Anna Machlin & Jo Robinson & Jane Pirkis, 2018. "Research Priorities in Suicide Prevention: Review of Australian Research from 2010–2017 Highlights Continued Need for Intervention Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-6, April.
    2. Matthew Large & Muthusamy Kaneson & Nicholas Myles & Hannah Myles & Pramudie Gunaratne & Christopher Ryan, 2016. "Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies of Suicide Risk Assessment among Psychiatric Patients: Heterogeneity in Results and Lack of Improvement over Time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karl Andriessen & Karolina Krysinska & Debra Rickwood & Jane Pirkis, 2022. "The Reactions of Adolescents, Parents and Clinicians to Participating in Qualitative Research Interviews Regarding Adolescents Bereaved by Suicide and Other Traumatic Death," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konrad Michel, 2021. "Suicide Models and Treatment Models Are Separate Entities. What Does It Mean for Clinical Suicide Prevention?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Frank Iorfino & Nicholas Ho & Joanne S Carpenter & Shane P Cross & Tracey A Davenport & Daniel F Hermens & Hannah Yee & Alissa Nichles & Natalia Zmicerevska & Adam Guastella & Elizabeth Scott & Ian B , 2020. "Predicting self-harm within six months after initial presentation to youth mental health services: A machine learning study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Seo-Eun Cho & Zong Woo Geem & Kyoung-Sae Na, 2021. "Development of a Suicide Prediction Model for the Elderly Using Health Screening Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Merike Sisask & Kairi Kõlves, 2018. "Towards a Greater Understanding of Suicidal Behaviour and Its Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Tara Hunt & Coralie Wilson & Peter Caputi & Ian Wilson & Alan Woodward, 2018. "Patterns of Signs That Telephone Crisis Support Workers Associate with Suicide Risk in Telephone Crisis Line Callers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Stéphanie Baggio & Abbas Kanani & Neslie Nsingi & Marlène Sapin & Raphaël Thélin, 2019. "Evaluation of A Suicide Prevention Program in Switzerland: Protocol of A Cluster Non-Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-6, June.
    7. Kathryn Turner & Anthony R. Pisani & Jerneja Sveticic & Nick O’Connor & Sabine Woerwag-Mehta & Kylie Burke & Nicolas J. C. Stapelberg, 2022. "The Paradox of Suicide Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. India Bellairs-Walsh & Sadhbh J. Byrne & Sarah Bendall & Yael Perry & Karolina Krysinska & Ashleigh Lin & Maria Michail & Michelle Lamblin & Tina Yutong Li & Sarah Hetrick & Jo Robinson, 2021. "Working with Young People at Risk of Suicidal Behaviour and Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Australian General Practitioners’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1094-:d:217551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.