IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4074-d279403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnose-Specific Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns at Otorhinolaryngology Inpatient Departments of Two Private Sector Healthcare Facilities in Central India: A Five-Year Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Silfwerbrand

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines, focusing antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Sumeer Verma

    (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain 456006, India)

  • Cora Sjökvist

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines, focusing antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines, focusing antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
    Contributed equally.)

  • Megha Sharma

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy (HSP): Medicines, focusing antibiotics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Pharmacology, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain 456006, India)

Abstract

Antibiotics are over-prescribed in low-and-middle-income countries, where the infection rate is high. The global paucity of standard treatment guidelines and reliable diagnose-specific prescription data from high-infection risk departments such as the otorhinolaryngology (ENT: ears, nose and throat) is a barrier to rationalize antibiotic use and combat antibiotic resistance. The study was conducted to present diagnose-specific antibiotic prescribing patterns of five years at ENT inpatient departments of two private-sector Indian hospitals. Data of all consecutive inpatients ( n = 3527) were collected but analyzed for the inpatients aged >15 years ( n = 2909) using the World Health Organization’s methodologies. Patient records were divided into four diagnoses groups: surgical, non-surgical, chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), and others. Of 2909 inpatients, 51% had surgical diagnoses. An average of 83% of patients in the clean surgery group and more than 75% in the viral and non-infectious groups were prescribed antibiotics. CSOM was the most common diagnosis (31%), where 90% of inpatients were prescribed antibiotics. Overall, third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones were most commonly prescribed. This study highlights the inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics to patients of clean surgeries, viral infections, and non-infectious groups. The single-prophylactic dose of antibiotic for clean-contaminated surgeries was replaced by the prolonged empirical prescribing. The use of microbiology investigations was insignificant.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Silfwerbrand & Sumeer Verma & Cora Sjökvist & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg & Megha Sharma, 2019. "Diagnose-Specific Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns at Otorhinolaryngology Inpatient Departments of Two Private Sector Healthcare Facilities in Central India: A Five-Year Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4074-:d:279403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4074-:d:279403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.