IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i1p127-d195077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study between a Novel In Vivo Method and CBCT for Assessment of Ridge Alterations after Socket Preservation—Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilena Ivanova

    (Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Ivan Chenchev

    (Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Stefan Zlatev

    (Department of Prosthetic dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Georgi Iordanov

    (Department of Department of Radiology, Dental and Physiotherapy Allergology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Eitan Mijiritsky

    (Head and Neck Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otoryngology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 699350, Israel)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two different methods for evaluation of alveolar bone resorption after the socket preservation procedure. In the current study, 9 patients with a total of nine teeth indicated for extraction were included. Patients received alveolar ridge preservation with allograft (BoneAlbumin™, OrthoSera Dental, Gyor, Hungary) or Platelet-Rich fibrin (PRF). CBCT (Planmeca ProMax 3D, Helsinki, Finland), was taken at 1 week and 4 months after the socket preservation procedure. A 3D scan, obtained with Trios (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) of the alveolar bone of the surgical site and the adjacent teeth at the place of extraction was performed during the surgical procedure, immediately after the graft placement in the alveolar socket, and after 4 months. Virtual study models were generated using the three-dimensional file processing software “Meshlab” (ISTI—CNR Rome Italy). The changes of alveolar height and width were measured and analyzed. Results were taken from both methods. Radiographic examination revealed that the average value of horizontal resorption is 0.6–2.4 mm, and vertical resorption is 0.46–2.8 mm. On virtual models, the average value for horizontal resorption is 1.92–3.64 mm, the vertical resorption value is 0.95–2.10 mm. The Trios intraoral scan can provide non-invasive and more accurate quantitative insights into the dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after the bone remodeling process. More research is needed for verification of these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilena Ivanova & Ivan Chenchev & Stefan Zlatev & Georgi Iordanov & Eitan Mijiritsky, 2019. "Comparative Study between a Novel In Vivo Method and CBCT for Assessment of Ridge Alterations after Socket Preservation—Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:127-:d:195077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:127-:d:195077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.