IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i10p1738-d231836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reevaluation of Historical Exposures to Ethylene Oxide Among U.S. Sterilization Workers in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Study Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth T. Bogen

    (Health Sciences, Exponent, Oakland, CA 94612, USA)

  • Patrick J. Sheehan

    (Health Sciences, Exponent, Oakland, CA 94612, USA)

  • Ciriaco Valdez-Flores

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Abby A. Li

    (Health Sciences, Exponent, Oakland, CA 94612, USA)

Abstract

The 2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment for ethylene oxide (EO) estimated a 10 −6 increased inhalation cancer risk of 0.1 parts per trillion, based on National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) epidemiology studies of sterilization facility workers exposed to EO between 1938 and 1986. The worker exposure estimates were based on a NIOSH statistical regression (NSR) model “validated” with EO levels measured after 1978. Between 1938 and 1978, when EO data was unavailable, the NSR model predicts exposures lowest in 1938 increasing to peak levels in 1978. That increasing EO concentration trend arose, in part, because engineering/industrial-hygiene (E/IH) factors associated with evolving EO-sterilization equipment and operations before 1978 were not properly considered in the NSR model. To test the NSR model trend prediction, a new E/IH-based model was developed using historical data on EO kill concentrations, EO residue levels in sterilized materials, post-wash EO concentrations in a sterilization chamber, and information on facility characteristics and sterilizer operator practices from operators familiar with pre-1978 industry conditions. The E/IH 90th percentile of 8 h time-weighted average EO exposures (C 90 ) for highly exposed sterilizer operators was calibrated to match 1978 C 90 values from the NSR model. E/IH model C 90 exposures were estimated to decrease over time from levels 16 and were four-fold greater than NSR-estimated exposures for workers during 1938–1954 and 1955–1964. This E/IH modeled trend is opposite to that of NSR model predictions of exposures before 1978, suggesting that EPA’s exclusive reliance on the NIOSH cohort to estimate EO cancer risk should be re-examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth T. Bogen & Patrick J. Sheehan & Ciriaco Valdez-Flores & Abby A. Li, 2019. "Reevaluation of Historical Exposures to Ethylene Oxide Among U.S. Sterilization Workers in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Study Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1738-:d:231836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1738-:d:231836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.