IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2018i1p94-d194100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee Stress, Reduced Productivity, and Interest in a Workplace Health Program: A Case Study from the Australian Mining Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara D. Street

    (Wesley Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4066, Australia)

  • Sarah J. Lacey

    (Wesley Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4066, Australia)

  • Klaire Somoray

    (Wesley Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4066, Australia)

Abstract

The Australian mining sector has an elevated industry prevalence of stress and high stress related productivity impairment costs. This study surveyed 897 employees from an Australian mining company to identify characteristics associated with: (a) high stress related productivity impairment costs; and (b) likelihood of stressed employees wanting stress management assistance at work. Groups associated with average annual productivity impairment costs in excess of $50,000 per employee included: permanent day shift employees; employees who reported being stressed at work most of the time; employees who reported being stress at work all of the time; and employees who were contemplating better managing their stress in the next 6 months. Overall, 52% of employees who identified as being in the contemplation stage of change for stress management and 52% of employees who experienced stress most of the time reported wanting stress assistance with stress. However, only 33% of stressed permanent day shift employees and 36% of employees who experienced stress all the time reported wanting stress assistance. To achieve a high return on investment when implementing workplace stress management programs in the mining industry, practitioners need to strategically target health promotion to engage stressed employees with high productivity impairment costs and low desire for stress management assistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara D. Street & Sarah J. Lacey & Klaire Somoray, 2018. "Employee Stress, Reduced Productivity, and Interest in a Workplace Health Program: A Case Study from the Australian Mining Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:94-:d:194100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/94/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/94/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robyn Considine & Ross Tynan & Carole James & John Wiggers & Terry Lewin & Kerry Inder & David Perkins & Tonelle Handley & Brian Kelly, 2017. "The Contribution of Individual, Social and Work Characteristics to Employee Mental Health in a Coal Mining Industry Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Zhang & Dongxiao Gu & Yuguang Xie & Aida Khakimova & Oleg Zolotarev, 2023. "How Do COVID-19 Risk, Life-Safety Risk, Job Insecurity, and Work–Family Conflict Affect Miner Performance? Health-Anxiety and Job-Anxiety Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carole James & Ross Tynan & Della Roach & Lucy Leigh & Christopher Oldmeadow & Mijanur Rahman & Brian Kelly, 2018. "Correlates of psychological distress among workers in the mining industry in remote Australia: Evidence from a multi-site cross-sectional survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:94-:d:194100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.