IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i9p2001-d169659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Ranavolo

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Via Fontana Candida 1, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Draicchio

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Via Fontana Candida 1, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

  • Tiwana Varrecchia

    (Department of Engineering, Roma TRE University, Via Vito Volterra 62, 00146 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessio Silvetti

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Via Fontana Candida 1, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

  • Sergio Iavicoli

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Via Fontana Candida 1, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background : In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quantitative instrumental-based biomechanical risk assessments in prevention of WMSDs. Methods : Articles written until 7 May 2018 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using specific keywords. Results : Instrumental approaches based on inertial measurement units and sEMG sensors have been used for direct evaluations to classify lifting tasks into low and high risk categories. Wearable sensors have also been used for direct instrumental evaluations in handling of low loads at high frequency activities by using the local myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue estimation. In the field of the rating of standard methods, on-body wireless sensors network-based approaches for real-time ergonomic assessment in industrial manufacturing have been proposed. Conclusions : Few studies foresee the use of wearable technologies for biomechanical risk assessment although the requirement to obtain increasingly quantitative evaluations, the recent miniaturization process and the need to follow a constantly evolving manual handling scenario is prompting their use.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Ranavolo & Francesco Draicchio & Tiwana Varrecchia & Alessio Silvetti & Sergio Iavicoli, 2018. "Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:9:p:2001-:d:169659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/9/2001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/9/2001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gou, H.-R. & Tanaka, S. & Halperin, W.E. & Cameron, L.L., 1999. "Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(7), pages 1029-1035.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicola Carbonaro & Gabriele Mascherini & Ilenia Bartolini & Maria Novella Ringressi & Antonio Taddei & Alessandro Tognetti & Nicola Vanello, 2021. "A Wearable Sensor-Based Platform for Surgeon Posture Monitoring: A Tool to Prevent Musculoskeletal Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Simona Del Ferraro & Tiziana Falcone & Alberto Ranavolo & Vincenzo Molinaro, 2020. "The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Damien Hoareau & Gurvan Jodin & Abdo-rahmane Anas Laaraibi & Jacques Prioux & Florence Razan, 2023. "Available Kinetic Energy Sources on the Human Body during Sports Activities: A Numerical Approach Based on Accelerometers for Cantilevered Piezoelectric Harvesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guantao Wang & Jingjing Pei, 2019. "Macro Risk: A Versatile and Universal Strategy for Measuring the Overall Safety of Hazardous Industrial Installations in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Patrick Wilms & Jan Schröder & Rüdiger Reer & Lorenz Scheit, 2022. "The Impact of “Home Office” Work on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Yang-Kun Ou & Yi Liu & Yu-Ping Chang & Bih-O Lee, 2021. "Relationship between Musculoskeletal Disorders and Work Performance of Nursing Staff: A Comparison of Hospital Nursing Departments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:9:p:2001-:d:169659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.