IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p739-d140779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population

Author

Listed:
  • Anne H. Y. Chu

    (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

  • Sheryl H. X. Ng

    (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

  • David Koh

    (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam)

  • Falk Müller-Riemenschneider

    (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre Berlin, Berlin 10098, Germany)

Abstract

This study examined the validity and reliability of a domain-specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) single-item sitting question using self- and interviewer-administered modes of administration against the triaxial ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer. The ASBQ and the GPAQ were administered twice, seven days apart. Participants were asked to put on the waist-worn accelerometer for seven days. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman’s rho, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland-Altman analysis ( n = 78). Reliability was assessed using the Spearman’s rho and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ( n = 84). Participants were adults aged 20–65 years and identifying as Chinese, Malay, or Indian. Only the self-administered GPAQ was significantly correlated with accelerometry-based measures (rho: 0.46), but not the interviewer-administered version (rho: 0.12). MAE for GPAQ was 207.5–218.3 min/day in relation to the accelerometer and for ASBQ was 154.7–174.6 min/day. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated large limits of agreement between questionnaire and accelerometry-based measures. While the self-administered GPAQ demonstrated a moderate correlation with accelerometry, the mean bias and the limits of agreement were large. The GPAQ (rho: 0.68–0.79; ICC: 0.68–0.78) and the ASBQ (rho: 0.53–0.64; ICC: 0.66–0.74) showed moderate-to-good reliability for total sedentary time using either self- or interviewer-administration. Future research should incorporate accelerometers to generate useful sedentary behaviour measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne H. Y. Chu & Sheryl H. X. Ng & David Koh & Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, 2018. "Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:739-:d:140779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ester Cerin & Shiyuan Yin & Wing Ka Choi & Winsfred Ngan & Rachel Tham & Anthony Barnett, 2021. "Development of Measures of Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Influencing, and Perceived Barriers to Engagement in, Healthy Behaviors for Older Chinese Immigrants to Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Eszter Füzéki & Jan Schröder & Nicolò Carraro & Laura Merlo & Rüdiger Reer & David A. Groneberg & Winfried Banzer, 2021. "Physical Activity during the First COVID-19-Related Lockdown in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Menno Luijkx & Marco Helbich, 2019. "Neighborhood Walkability Is Not Associated with Adults’ Sedentary Behavior in the Residential Setting: Evidence from Breda, The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Stefano Ferracuti & Osvalda De Giglio & Giuseppina Caggiano & Carmela Protano & Federica Valeriani & Eduardo Alfonso Parisi & Giuliana Valerio & Giorgio Liguori , 2020. "Sedentary Behaviors and Physical Activity of Italian Undergraduate Students during Lockdown at the Time of CoViD−19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Kexin Zhang & Sufang Huang & Danni Feng & Xiaorong Lang & Quan Wang & Yuchen Liu, 2022. "Sedentary Behavioral Studies of Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Hypertension in the Framework of Behavioral Epidemiology: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Hui Gao & Xingxing Li & Yunhua Zi & Xuanwen Mu & Mingjian Fu & Tingting Mo & Kuai Yu, 2022. "Reliability and Validity of Common Subjective Instruments in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Chinese College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Kamalesh C. Dey & Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer & Lindsey R. Smith & Rebecca L. Jones & Daniel P. Bailey, 2021. "The Prevalence of Daily Sedentary Time in South Asian Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Xiaofen D. Keating & Ke Zhou & Xiaolu Liu & Michael Hodges & Jingwen Liu & Jianmin Guan & Ashley Phelps & Jose Castro-Piñero, 2019. "Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Gerson Luis de Moraes Ferrari & André Oliveira Werneck & Danilo Rodrigues da Silva & Irina Kovalskys & Georgina Gómez & Attilio Rigotti & Lilia Yadira Cortés Sanabria & Martha Cecilia Yépez García & R, 2020. "Socio-Demographic Correlates of Total and Domain-Specific Sedentary Behavior in Latin America: A Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:739-:d:140779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.