IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i12p2832-d189956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Ruderal Species Diversity to an Urban Environment: Implications for Conservation and Management

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Guo

    (Center for Environmental Risk and Damage Assessment, Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China
    Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Fang Yu

    (Center for Environmental Risk and Damage Assessment, Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Yuan Ren

    (State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Dong Liu

    (Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Jia Li

    (Lanxi Environmental protection monitoring station, Lanxi 321100, China)

  • Zhiyun Ouyang

    (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Xiaoke Wang

    (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China)

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities have weakened the invasion of ruderals and increased the number of non-native species in urban areas. Ruderals are an important component of urban plant diversity and are of great significance to the sustainable development of urban green space. We used the tessellation–randomized plot method to examine the composition and biodiversity of ruderal species among urban land use types (LUTs) in the built-up areas of Beijing. Soil samples from the surface to a depth of 10 cm were taken from each site to examine the impact of soil characteristics on ruderal species diversity. Results showed that a total of 120 ruderal species were observed, including 71 native and 49 non-native species. Among them, 90% were identified as Cosmopolitan. Native species accounted for the majority of ruderals across all the eight LUTs. Institutional, residential, and woodlot areas with coarser management had higher ruderal species richness than did commercial areas and roadside lawns. Allergenic species showed the highest proportions in municipal parks, and invasive species accounted for 20% of all ruderal species. Ruderal species diversity was related to distance from the urban center, pruning intensity, and soil characteristics. These results suggest that with ruderals playing an important role in urban grass species diversity, there is tremendous potential for more native species in Beijing lawns, which would contribute substantially to increasing the ecological system’s functional benefits. Ruderal species accustomed to the causal processes and environmental conditions of different LUTs should be used and conserved properly to improve the harsh conditions of different LUTs and to sustain ecosystem health.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Guo & Fang Yu & Yuan Ren & Dong Liu & Jia Li & Zhiyun Ouyang & Xiaoke Wang, 2018. "Response of Ruderal Species Diversity to an Urban Environment: Implications for Conservation and Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2832-:d:189956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2832/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/12/2832/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:12:p:2832-:d:189956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.